Next cab off the rank is an experiment to compare the drag effects of foil thickness versus surface area/depth. When sailing in the weed the shorter the fin the less weed drag. Hence a fat foil that has enough lifting power, packaged it in an 18cm fin.
The foil has 125 per cent more lift than the fin above, but the surface area is only 75 per cent. In an ideal world, ignoring all the inefficiencies of outline, pressure leakage etc etc, I am hoping the total lift generated will be somewhere close enough to be able to compare weed drag versus pressure drag.
The fin in the post above is 24cm depth. The one below is 18 cm.
The 18cm has an even more pronounced profile concavity toward the trailing edge. (Second photo.)
The 24cm fin above came in at just over a kilo. I decided to have a crack at shedding some more weight, so you can see the silhouette of the hollows for carbon rods and foam inserts. Despite the 20mm diameter hollows, the foil is thick enough that there is plenty of space laterally to fit in enough resin for strength (32mm thickness at max)- bottom photo. ( in the background is my apprentice Ernie)
3D printing - I am experimenting with increased wall thickness around my carbon rod holes. Given the PETG is reasonably good in compression, I thought I would see how a print with a higher percentage of filament material around the internal hollows fared.
The apparently massive fillet will be trimmed back. I enlarged the fillet to create a greater surface area on the print bed to increase the PETG adhesion and prevent warping.
I printed the first part of the fin on a hotter bed and nozzle temp, thicker first layer and at a slower speed. This seems to have been successful in keeping the base nice and flat.