Grantmac said..
We have a distance race around an island in Seattle. It's open to any windsurfing gear you want. It runs under two bridges and the island is tall enough to form massive wind shadows.
The record was held by one guy with a Div2 board for YEARS. Most people used a raceboard to run it with Formula making a rare appearance.
Within two years of foils hitting the scene only record was being beaten on a regular basis.
Or local short course racing is the same. A few isolated videos of decent sailors passing poor ones doesn't change that.
If you mean the Winduro then it doesn't seem like an ideal comparison. The description seems to show that it's a race held specifically in fairly strong winds, sometime within a three-month period. So it's a long, largely open-water (compared to Sydney Harbour where the OP sails) race on a specially-selected and pretty rare day, and even the promoters agree that it's a "real bummer" that the scheduling means that keen sailors can't do it. That makes it quite a different sort of sailing from sailing on Sydney Harbour or somewhere similar when you happen to have spare time and want to be able to reliably have fun, no matter what the wind.
It'd be interesting to see why you claim the windfoilers are faster. According to this thread (
groups.io/g/nw-windtalk/topic/official_2018_winduro_part/27745765?p=,,,20,0,0,0::recentpostdate%2Fsticky,,,20,2,0,27745765) the fastest RB was about 15 minutes quicker than the fastest foiler in one Winduro in 2018.
It looks like there were two events that year, and a foiler beat a RB by 5 minutes in the other event. That indicates that the RBs were faster overall. However, because the foilers couldn't get through the weed where the RBs started, it seems they were started earlier and on the course; according to the organiser "the more experienced foilers and more experienced longboarders did NOT get the same wind, in the same places around the island."
Obviously no one would disagree that a windfoiler is quicker than a RB in open water and good wind. It's no contest. But that ignores the fact that lots of longboarders spend lots of time sailing in lighter winds or more enclosed and shifty waters. In those conditions, foilers are slower.
It's like comparing a top fuel dragster or F1 car to a racing four wheel drive or a rally car; obviously one is far faster in ideal conditions, but the other can handle a wider range of conditions. Slagging off either type is just dumb. They are both great for different uses.
By the way, with respect a city of 4 million people that sees so little windsurfer racing is hardly a model that we should look up to. When I left Sydney (which has a similar population) a few years ago one fleet alone would have 25 longboards each Wednesday and 15 or so on Saturday.
The combined longboard state titles in NSW (a state with a population of a 7.5 million people) attracted NINETY longboards. How can anyone suggest that an approach that puts 90 boards on the water is worse than the approach that puts 15 or so boards on the water?