Brand changes in the big guns

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
windsufering
windsufering
VIC
1124 posts
VIC, 1124 posts
21 Dec 2011 10:18pm
care
174
174
NSW
190 posts
174 174
NSW, 190 posts
21 Dec 2011 10:20pm
[b]CJW said...
Yeah, they won freestyle world championships.....>_>

Yep. Bjorn the first one, Albeau in 2001, Pritchard in 2002. (Josh stone in 1999, 2000)
barn
barn
WA
2960 posts
WA, 2960 posts
21 Dec 2011 7:27pm
174 said...

[b]CJW said...
Yeah, they won freestyle world championships.....>_>

Yep. Bjorn the first one, Albeau in 2001, Pritchard in 2002. (Josh stone in 1999, 2000)



lol


174
174
NSW
190 posts
174 174
NSW, 190 posts
21 Dec 2011 10:40pm
barn said...

174 said...

[b]CJW said...
Yeah, they won freestyle world championships.....>_>

Yep. Bjorn the first one, Albeau in 2001, Pritchard in 2002. (Josh stone in 1999, 2000)



lol





heh, yeah *not sure if serious*. Well their 2002 grade freestyle was still better freestyle than 99% of us ten years on . unfortunately
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
21 Dec 2011 8:14pm
Jezstrt said...

Does barn sail, I thought he was just sponsored to bag Neil Pryde on the forums..


Nah, he's an Ezzy team rider, with Kevin Pritchard.

He bags them out, just to seem impartial.


barn
barn
WA
2960 posts
WA, 2960 posts
21 Dec 2011 8:37pm
FormulaNova said...

Jezstrt said...

Does barn sail, I thought he was just sponsored to bag Neil Pryde on the forums..


Nah, he's an Ezzy team rider, with Kevin Pritchard.

He bags them out, just to seem impartial.



I'm flattered that my witticisms appear deserving of sponsorship! haha

Alas, it's all just freelance fun.. Nothing like a ruse to pass the time while waiting for my epoxy disasters to cure..

As an observation, Ezzy sailors don't get anywhere near as upset as Pryde Hards, who have yet to develop such thick skin from years of abuse..

Neilpryde = Nickelback

Ezzy = ummm Lionel Richie?
stringer
stringer
WA
703 posts
WA, 703 posts
21 Dec 2011 10:00pm
Neil pryde would have to have the biggest payroll of all sails brands. Something must fuel the salaries of the people who do things like R and D. This cost to the business is quite possibly reflected in their prices and not all other windsurfing brands share such a balance within their business model, which cruels the pitch for competitive pricing.
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
22 Dec 2011 7:32am
barn said...

FormulaNova said...

Jezstrt said...

Does barn sail, I thought he was just sponsored to bag Neil Pryde on the forums..


Nah, he's an Ezzy team rider, with Kevin Pritchard.

He bags them out, just to seem impartial.



I'm flattered that my witticisms appear deserving of sponsorship! haha

Alas, it's all just freelance fun.. Nothing like a ruse to pass the time while waiting for my epoxy disasters to cure..

As an observation, Ezzy sailors don't get anywhere near as upset as Pryde Hards, who have yet to develop such thick skin from years of abuse..

Neilpryde = Nickelback

Ezzy = ummm Lionel Richie?


Hey - Lionel Richie? Woo hoo! I am trendy again!

Seriously though, a lot of people go in for how pretty a sail looks, and nothing more. How many people do you know that try a sail before they actually buy it?


From what I have seen, people look at a sail, and then commit. How else can you explain people upgrading their quiver each year, assuming that the new sails are better.

Me, I am trying an Ezzy again. I rigged, for the first time, an Infinity on the RDM it is meant for, and was surprised at how much better it was than when I rigged it on another brands SDM.

Of course, even if it sails badly, I will come up with some justification...
evlPanda
evlPanda
NSW
9207 posts
NSW, 9207 posts
22 Dec 2011 10:59am
FormulaNova said...

Seriously though, a lot of people go in for how pretty a sail looks, and nothing more. How many people do you know that try a sail before they actually buy it?

From what I have seen, people look at a sail, and then commit. How else can you explain people upgrading their quiver each year, assuming that the new sails are better.



So why do people still buy Pryde? They look like a homeless dog's breakfast regurgitated and eaten again for breakfast these days.


Nickelback fans meet President Obama:

choco
choco
SA
4181 posts
SA, 4181 posts
22 Dec 2011 10:59am
evlPanda said...

FormulaNova said...

Seriously though, a lot of people go in for how pretty a sail looks, and nothing more. How many people do you know that try a sail before they actually buy it?

From what I have seen, people look at a sail, and then commit. How else can you explain people upgrading their quiver each year, assuming that the new sails are better.



So why do people still buy Pryde? They look like a homeless dog's breakfast regurgitated and eaten again for breakfast these days.







Simple they've been in the industry from the day dot, developed some good inovations and have stayed in the industry unlike other brands which have fallen to the wayside......in saying that they are pricing themselves out of the market.
barn
barn
WA
2960 posts
WA, 2960 posts
22 Dec 2011 10:41am
stringer said...

Neil pryde would have to have the biggest payroll of all sails brands. Something must fuel the salaries of the people who do things like R and D. This cost to the business is quite possibly reflected in their prices




Think they could cover that by their volume of sales. We're paying for the brand name. Anybody who can't see this is just a victim of their (quite frankly) outstanding marketing department. Just look at their Bicycle frame.

An example of R&D was Kauli and the Boxer at Naish.. They let him loose and he built what he wanted, not what the accountants told him they could sell... You don't need a million dollar R&D operation to build good stuff, you just need ideas and the skills to apply them..

NP bought Kauli, and no doubt that payed off. They got credibility behind their new Kauli signature sail, and got to put JP-austria stickers on Kauli's Quartro..

Wonder what the SVB signature sail will be called.. The Soul?.. They'll make a JP signature also, probably not as Badass as the F2 Rodeo..
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
22 Dec 2011 11:20am
barn said...
An example of R&D was Kauli and the Boxer at Naish.. They let him loose and he built what he wanted, not what the accountants told him they could sell... You don't need a million dollar R&D operation to build good stuff, you just need ideas and the skills to apply them..


Yup... and not one but Kauli could actually sail with it. I am sorry but the Boxer was the biggest turd of a sail on the market.

CJW
CJW
NSW
1731 posts
CJW CJW
NSW, 1731 posts
22 Dec 2011 4:32pm
stehsegler said...

barn said...
An example of R&D was Kauli and the Boxer at Naish.. They let him loose and he built what he wanted, not what the accountants told him they could sell... You don't need a million dollar R&D operation to build good stuff, you just need ideas and the skills to apply them..


Yup... and not one but Kauli could actually sail with it. I am sorry but the Boxer was the biggest turd of a sail on the market.




You can't deny it pushed a lot of the industry towards lower aspect short luff wave sails though.

barn
barn
WA
2960 posts
WA, 2960 posts
22 Dec 2011 1:58pm
When making such big, instant changes to a sail layout you're bound to miss the mark on many fronts. Point was they did it, with probably two guys and an email address for the prototype factory in China..

So while the Gen 1 Boxer may not have been amazing, it was still a notable sail, and farking cool.. The later ones before he left were better..

So to compare the 1st Boxer with the current Fly2 is unfair, you'd be best comparing the last Boxer to the first Fly.

But even this wouldn't be fair because the Fly was aimed at a different market, it would have been dumbed down so the the punter could sail it in a straight line..

----------

Another example then, the Skinny mast, you don't need a massive R&D budget to develop a RDM... Yet, how many years after everybody went to skinnys did it take for Pryde to even build one? And they still don't make Skinny specific sails...

And they don't even put the weights of their sails on the website.
ginger pom
ginger pom
VIC
1746 posts
VIC, 1746 posts
22 Dec 2011 11:05pm
Mark _australia said...
]Hate[/b] the lack of longevity






stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
22 Dec 2011 11:05pm
barn said...
And they don't even put the weights of their sails on the website.


neither does simmer and a few others.
aus301
aus301
QLD
2039 posts
QLD, 2039 posts
23 Dec 2011 7:48am
stehsegler said...

barn said...
And they don't even put the weights of their sails on the website.


neither does simmer and a few others.


hhahahaaa... Thats the sort of argument I have with my 3yr old. "Son why didn't you do what I asked", "Johnny didn't" Still don't make it right.
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
23 Dec 2011 7:49am
aus301 said...

stehsegler said...

barn said...
And they don't even put the weights of their sails on the website.


neither does simmer and a few others.


hhahahaaa... Thats the sort of argument I have with my 3yr old. "Son why didn't you do what I asked", "Johnny didn't" Still don't make it right.


well... the reason why they don't tell you the weight is mostly because of variations in production. If someone announces something like our sails weigh 3.43 kgs I would very much doubt the actual weight is accurate down to 30 grams. I am guessing the tolerance could be as much as 5% maybe even higher. Especially the new printing technique applied to sails must have big variations.

Perhaps it's a legal issue... I know in some markets like the US making statements on your web site mean you actually have to honour them in the product you sell.

Speaking of printing technique. I want to see a manufacturer release a custom range where I can print my own designs. How awesome would that be.
aus301
aus301
QLD
2039 posts
QLD, 2039 posts
23 Dec 2011 10:16am
stehsegler said...

well... the reason why they don't tell you the weight is mostly because of variations in production. If someone announces something like our sails weigh 3.43 kgs I would very much doubt the actual weight is accurate down to 30 grams. I am guessing the tolerance could be as much as 5% maybe even higher. Especially the new printing technique applied to sails must have big variations.

Perhaps it's a legal issue... I know in some markets like the US making statements on your web site mean you actually have to honour them in the product you sell.

Speaking of printing technique. I want to see a manufacturer release a custom range where I can print my own designs. How awesome would that be.


Tolerance of 5% on 3.43kg is only 17grams. They may have reasons they don't advertise the weight, but I really don't think that is it.

Legal issue, there are many items I have bought from the states that have had printed tolerance of say +/-5%. So the legal argument does't seem to hold true for everyone?

I have nothing against any sail brand when it comes down to it, I personally have never liked the feel of pride sails, but thats just me. But I find it incredibly amusing when the total fanboi's get on forums and act as if brand X can do no wrong etc etc. They pimp the brand left right and centre often to the innocent bystander act as if they are a major part of the company. It's even funnier when Barn throws in a line a manages co catch a few fish, well done.

Realistically many of these companies have probably been able to afford to halve their marketing budgets over the last 10 years as they get all this free fanboi marketing.



Rob11
Rob11
240 posts
240 posts
23 Dec 2011 8:28am
aus301 said...
Tolerance of 5% on 3.43kg is only 17grams.


Hmmm... is that the argument you have with your kid
gregc
gregc
VIC
1299 posts
VIC, 1299 posts
23 Dec 2011 11:29am
the technology for printing on anything is already tried and tested and its a great idea in theory. The practicality of doing it would be a reduction in the brand (by having a million different printing options there is no standard look and feel to the product). The other issue that may pop up is a weight issue. Would you as a punter want a heavier sail?

Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7268 posts
WA, 7268 posts
23 Dec 2011 8:35am
If you sail a Pryde you have got a heavier sail already
swoosh
swoosh
QLD
1929 posts
QLD, 1929 posts
23 Dec 2011 10:49am
stehsegler said...
well... the reason why they don't tell you the weight is mostly because of variations in production. If someone announces something like our sails weigh 3.43 kgs I would very much doubt the actual weight is accurate down to 30 grams. I am guessing the tolerance could be as much as 5% maybe even higher. Especially the new printing technique applied to sails must have big variations.

Perhaps it's a legal issue... I know in some markets like the US making statements on your web site mean you actually have to honour them in the product you sell.

Speaking of printing technique. I want to see a manufacturer release a custom range where I can print my own designs. How awesome would that be.


Seriously... how much are pryde paying you... this reply reeks of desperation, definitely clasping at straws there. Why are you trying to defend them so hard? Just admit, like any other sail brand they have their pro's and con's (yes severne sails have their cons as well).

Manufacturers have no issues printing board weights with a +-5% disclaimer. And I believe Pryde last year had sail weights listed with a +-5% disclaimer. My only guess is this year they don't want the market to easily see how much heavier their sails are then the competition, seeing as the market has been buying into the current lightweight sail fad/trend. Even North who are similarly notoriously slow with catching up to the market have released a range of lightweight wavesails this year.

Also, you can get Hotsails Superfreaks with custom printed graphics. But whether or not you want one is another question.


Carantoc
Carantoc
WA
7268 posts
WA, 7268 posts
23 Dec 2011 8:50am
Biggest move of the season though might be the fast breaking news that Carantoc will be moving from Mrs Macs to Four N'Twenty for 2012
elmo
elmo
WA
8890 posts
WA, 8890 posts
23 Dec 2011 9:46am
Most important news for the season.......

in 4hrs I go from work mode to holiday mode

all else is irrelevant
SeanAUS120
SeanAUS120
QLD
769 posts
QLD, 769 posts
23 Dec 2011 11:50am
OH GOD I would NEVER want to put sail weights on a website!

I think last year at Point-7 we got the factory to weigh our sails then wrote in a "blog post" only that our new race sails would be 1kg lighter ... turns out the guys in Sri Lanka measured wrong and they ranged from about 250-750g lighter. Literally got FLAMED all over our website for about 3 months with people calling us LIARS... hahaha. It's too complicated to be accurate because you are trusting the guys at the factory to weigh your sails, not you yourself. They might even be using cheap scales that aren't accurate!

The only way to really be accurate is to wait till the first production run gets in to stock at your head office and WEIGH THEM YOURSELF. But everyone wants the weights 3 months before production finishes to make a decision before they pre-order...arggghh.

That being said, we still took the risk and listed weights of our custom race sails - point-7.com/

stehsegler said...
Speaking of printing technique. I want to see a manufacturer release a custom range where I can print my own designs. How awesome would that be.


PS, we'll have a custom wave sail available next year ... unfortunately no custom graphics but you can have custom sail numbers screen printed on. They will be between 1kg and 6kg lighter than any sail on the market (+/- 80%)
whippingboy
whippingboy
WA
1104 posts
WA, 1104 posts
23 Dec 2011 9:59am
elmo said...

Most important news for the season.......

in 4hrs I go from work mode to holiday mode

all else is irrelevant


.. and the forecast is looking good
DunkO
DunkO
NSW
1150 posts
NSW, 1150 posts
23 Dec 2011 1:04pm
5% of 3.43Kg is 171.5g not 17g

3430g x 0.05= 171



wieght is not everything! is 1/2 a kilo really worth sacrificing durability, especially when some wave sails from the big name brands are nearly a grand.
give me something that will take a beating! mind you i do eat sh!t a lot.
SeanAUS120
SeanAUS120
QLD
769 posts
QLD, 769 posts
23 Dec 2011 12:15pm
Weight is DEFINITELY not everything! It's quite possible to make sails that feel a LOT lighter in the hands without actually reducing the weight. The Boxer sails are a good example of this ... generally, more compact mast lengths and wider booms give the sail a much lighter feeling in the hands (obviously lot's more variables in there, but "generally" speaking).
KA360
KA360
NSW
803 posts
NSW, 803 posts
23 Dec 2011 1:18pm
How huch paint do they put on the prydes-
2 coats of undercoat,3 coats of colour then 2 coats of sealer /gloss?
I can't believe you think the printed graphics add significant weight.

Pryde simply uses thicker/heavier materials because they don't want warranty claims.Sails being returned cost them money and their shareholders want profit.
Wasn't JP using black tinted fibreglass which the customers just presumed was carbon?do they still?

Gaastra's new freestyle sail ,the PURE ,has lots of printed graphics. The pink on them fades very quickly and has nearly dissapeared after a couple of months.Does this mean that it gets significantly lighter and performs better with age?
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅