More mast questions..carbon , boom pressure

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14953 posts
QLD, 14953 posts
31 Dec 2010 1:38pm
DunkO said...

Gestalt said...

nah, i'm an average joe on the water.

i don't take any particular care of my gear, i leave it in the sun, never wash it etc.
i weigh 105kg+ so i put a lot of force onto things when i stack it.

over the years i've seen a lot of brands of gear just break for no apparent reason. you just need to vote with your wallet.

not to say stuff doesn't break, cause it does, but there is stuff out there that is very hard to break.

edit,,,, thought i'd add, i don't buy 100% carbon masts. i always go for 60-80% as they take more knocks and don't cost a mint. sails are xply, fins g10 where i can, boards are timber layup, booms carbon that don't have a breakage record.. etc etc.




totally agree with you on this one... not going to mention brands but i think there are different durability amongst them.

I did ask the question recently about 100% being more brittle/ prone to snap??
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/General/Loft-Sails-Mast-Compatibility/

where were your comments regarding it then...? (before i purchased another full carbon...i don't want to talk about what happened to it)

I noticed while doing some research some brands don't do 100% in rdm, sailworks and ezzy for example.... could this be for longevity of the mast.

All that said accidental breakages can still occur.




i think you started that thread when there were 6 other mast threads going at the same time. i was desensitised.
sboardcrazy
sboardcrazy
NSW
8333 posts
NSW, 8333 posts
31 Dec 2010 4:15pm
Test pilot 1 said...

I use a 30% carbon mast for land sailing. I bought it new 3 yr ago. i have crash landed after becoming airborne in 85kph winds, flipped numerous times onto the mast all under full power. No damge as yet.


Living up to your name I see..
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
1 Jan 2011 8:07am
DunkO said...

totally agree with you on this one... not going to mention brands but i think there are different durability amongst them.

I did ask the question recently about 100% being more brittle/ prone to snap??
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/General/Loft-Sails-Mast-Compatibility/

where were your comments regarding it then...? (before i purchased another full carbon...i don't want to talk about what happened to it)

I noticed while doing some research some brands don't do 100% in rdm, sailworks and ezzy for example.... could this be for longevity of the mast.

All that said accidental breakages can still occur.



I mentioned 100% carbon masts breaking in the heat in this very thread, and I am sure it has been mentioned on here in the past. I agree and where there is an option I would buy around 75% carbon as a good compromise.

The Ezzy RDMs are 91% carbon, and I think I also read that this is because the final outside layer is fibreglass for protection.

evets
evets
WA
685 posts
WA, 685 posts
1 Jan 2011 8:49am
nebbian said...

KenHo said...

Breakage around the join suggests that the 2 mast halves may have separated a bit during rigging, which creates nasty loading points.


+1

Sboardcrazy, are you using tape around the join? This stops the halves separating when putting the sail in, and stops sand getting in.


Anyone know why this was red thumbed? I put tape around the joint for the reasons Nebbian posted. When I do not I sometimes find I struggle to get the 2 parts apart due to sand ingress.
NotWal
NotWal
QLD
7436 posts
QLD, 7436 posts
1 Jan 2011 11:31am
Gestalt said...

DunkO said...

Gestalt said...

nah, i'm an average joe on the water.

i don't take any particular care of my gear, i leave it in the sun, never wash it etc.
i weigh 105kg+ so i put a lot of force onto things when i stack it.

over the years i've seen a lot of brands of gear just break for no apparent reason. you just need to vote with your wallet.

not to say stuff doesn't break, cause it does, but there is stuff out there that is very hard to break.

edit,,,, thought i'd add, i don't buy 100% carbon masts. i always go for 60-80% as they take more knocks and don't cost a mint. sails are xply, fins g10 where i can, boards are timber layup, booms carbon that don't have a breakage record.. etc etc.




totally agree with you on this one... not going to mention brands but i think there are different durability amongst them.

I did ask the question recently about 100% being more brittle/ prone to snap??
www.seabreeze.com.au/forums/Windsurfing/General/Loft-Sails-Mast-Compatibility/

where were your comments regarding it then...? (before i purchased another full carbon...i don't want to talk about what happened to it)

I noticed while doing some research some brands don't do 100% in rdm, sailworks and ezzy for example.... could this be for longevity of the mast.

All that said accidental breakages can still occur.




i think you started that thread when there were 6 other mast threads going at the same time. i was desensitised.


+1
I wasn't paying attention.

However a belated response: If you are not sailing in the waves I would go for 100% C. (if we're talking about RDMs). You can get them at a reasonable less unreasonable price and they are a tad lighter than the Ezzies. If sailing in the waves its a toss up.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅