Possible shark attack Cottesloe

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
17 Oct 2011 3:54pm
Ah, ignorance strikes again.
'Our sharks are out of control'?
Pah-lease.

Oh and comparing croc ecology to sharks? Doesn't work that way.
WATER MAN
WATER MAN
WA
139 posts
WA, 139 posts
18 Oct 2011 5:43pm
Mate I am not sure if you are a Uni student still studying or you are finished Uni and working as a qualified Marine Biologist, but I think you have missed your calling. Ever thought of becoming a politician or a lawyer? Sounds like you must know a lot about Crock management too.
Maybe I should have written Sharks are out of our control.

subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
18 Oct 2011 6:27pm
That's your reply? Ha!
Yep, ignorance = bliss
bakesy
bakesy
WA
682 posts
WA, 682 posts
18 Oct 2011 6:46pm
Suba, maybe you can help on this one. Water Man has what appears to be a Port Jackson as his avatar, I'm pretty sure they are a protected species along with the Grey Nurse and GWS, question is why are the PJ and Grey Nurse protected? is it because they were close to extinction? croc's were in the same place back in the 70's right? so the bronzies and whiskeries I've been catching the last couple of years are in strong numbers according to research so there will be no chance they will be afforded the same protection?
WATER MAN
WATER MAN
WA
139 posts
WA, 139 posts
18 Oct 2011 7:29pm
Suba the more you get worked up about the animal you love, the less credible your opinions become. There are only a few things I have understood about you.
You love the ocean and all the creatures in it especially the GWS.
You have spent many hours researching the ocean and creatures in it.
You can't stand any person who has an opinion different to yours and feel you need to abuse their view's and intelligence.
Zuke
Zuke
901 posts
901 posts
18 Oct 2011 8:57pm
bakesy, when I used to spearfish regularly I was told that Port Jackson sharks were protected was because they were so easy to spear and were a common by catch by people fishing that they could easily be over fished and therefore needed protecting.

I can vouch for them being easy to spear, I've never speared one but they just lye on the bottom waiting for a pat. Very easy targets.
bakesy
bakesy
WA
682 posts
WA, 682 posts
18 Oct 2011 9:29pm
was this in WA Zuke? been fishing all my life and have caught maybe three, thought they were very rare in these waters, hence the name. My mates that spear fish say that a lot of fish seem pretty easy, namely coral trout and dhuies. They say these two seem to turn sideways to look at you! fatal behaviour when being hunted.. I would say your theory on the PJ's seems valid, I wonder if they are tasty as this seems to add to a species vulnerability either tasty or scary and you're in trouble it seems!
subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
18 Oct 2011 10:16pm
WATER MAN said...

You can't stand any person who has an opinion different to yours and feel you need to abuse their view's and intelligence.



Way to make an assumption, chump.
It's not my fault you get butthurt when I explain to you why you're wrong.

I'm more than happy to argue facts. I could do it all day. Feel free to contribute.
WATER MAN
WATER MAN
WA
139 posts
WA, 139 posts
18 Oct 2011 10:28pm
Bakesy, I am in believe what Zuke has written is correct. The floors of the ocean in the 50's and 60's were plentiful of Port Jackson's and made easy pickings for the tough fisho. This was the same as the Grey Nurse. My old man has told me he eat a few when he was a kid, but didn't fancy the taste. The one in my picture is a big catch. It would be the biggest we have caught. The area we fish we would catch 1 or 2 a session, some times 3. I don't hate sharks, I just think it is time to cull the not so friendly ones.
bakesy
bakesy
WA
682 posts
WA, 682 posts
18 Oct 2011 10:35pm
WM, do you fish Mandurah waters mate? been catching heaps of bronzies,hammers and whiskeries? BTW didn't imply you hated sharks but it seems you want a cull from some of your posts. Personally I'm right on the fence on this one, wish there was a way we could deal with them the way they do with crocs in the NT, but I think we are dealing with a different beast with a pretty random behavioural pattern. I watch a doco series on Foxtel called Shark Men, they tag GWS and monitor them, they are still pretty unsure of their behaviours but are getting there. problem is this is in the states but they are hopeful that the research will benefit other countries, check it out on Youtube, mad stuff!!
subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
18 Oct 2011 10:52pm
bakesy said...
they tag GWS and monitor them, they are still pretty unsure of their behaviours but are getting there. problem is this is in the states but they are hopeful that the research will benefit other countries,


They do the exact same thing here
smicko
smicko
WA
2503 posts
WA, 2503 posts
18 Oct 2011 11:28pm
Port Jackson's are NOT a protected species in West Oz. It's a popular myth that they are.
bakesy
bakesy
WA
682 posts
WA, 682 posts
18 Oct 2011 11:28pm
have you seen the show? they've got some pretty high tech gear, not sure we can lift them out of the water for 15 minutes, take blood, semen samples and install the state of the art software these boys do. Plus they have done this to around 30 sharks in the last couple of seasons. I know the yanks like to brag a bit but in this case they're right, done nowhere else in the world like this. the head honcho is a Dr Domeyer (think that's the right spelling) and he is the man!! Millions spent.
subasurf
subasurf
WA
2154 posts
WA, 2154 posts
18 Oct 2011 11:34pm
Aaah yes you're right. My bad; I forgot about the samples they take!
Big stuff in the field of GWS research.
WATER MAN
WATER MAN
WA
139 posts
WA, 139 posts
18 Oct 2011 11:40pm
Yer bakesy, fish Mandurah and out behind Rotto. The PJ's we get are more down towards Bunno. I was a deckhand from 89 to 95 on wet liners and cray boats, had my first kid in 96 so had to get a steady job for the sake of the Mrs. I still go out on a cray boat on day's off for fun and catch up but no longer can wet line on them. On our little boat we have been getting whiskeries a lot but haven't seen a hammer for years. 15 years ago it would have been the most common our boat would have seen out from Mandurah. Last year we had three Bronzies mess with us all day while diving, but never got nasty. Over the past 10 years mates off boats are telling of more and more accounts of GWS in areas not seen before. Not so comforting if you gotta dive for a pot stuck under a reef. Even been told of a pot that was being chomped while being pulled. My Grandad was a fisho and would tell us of the Big Whites down South around Denmark and Albany, I never thought it would be around our shore's. The ocean play's a huge part in our life through work and play, so to me the ocean is just as much my home as it is to the shark. From what I have learnt, these sharks aren't stupid. They can work in teams and do have memory. As they feel less threatened in the inshore waters, they will come closer and closer in.
bakesy
bakesy
WA
682 posts
WA, 682 posts
18 Oct 2011 11:56pm
sounds a bit like my twenties WM, worked around Jurien through to Lancelin and finished up at Two Rocks, got a real(less fun) job but still go out from time to time with a mate. There's no doubt things have changed but I must say that the Fisheries made some tough calls and it seems to be paying off, never caught more dhuies than this season and the crays were amazing out deep this year. I find it hard not being able to pull droppies on the mate's crayboat, he has to fish with me or on the deckies boat!! As for the GWS I can confirm what you're saying and agree with your view on the home thing, I feel the same way and was also brought up to respect all that live in it, take what is acceptable (bag limits were too high for too long IMO) and remember that there is stuff in the ocean that's capable of gettin ya, I avoid the known hotspots but to hear of them off Avalon was a bit of a worry.
WATER MAN
WATER MAN
WA
139 posts
WA, 139 posts
19 Oct 2011 12:19am
The one at Tims that is there year after year was back again on Saturday, think it may have got to Avalon Sunday morning. In saying that I had one under me at Gearies last year, just a small one. I walked on water and carried my board out. When I got to the car park my son asked if I had seen the fin just behind me, he took a look at my face and new the answer. Or was it the smell.
Agent000
Agent000
161 posts
161 posts
19 Oct 2011 12:35am
too right smicko the only protection pjs have is that they are kinda friendly looking and probably taste crap ( wouldn't know personly cos they are too friendly looking to kill)
at least that is the case way over here in the cayman islands
BulldogPup
BulldogPup
6657 posts
6657 posts
19 Oct 2011 1:24am
Just one question I have is - why have the GW's in particular been drawn to WA in such larger numbers ?, I mean what has changed their normal foodie targets (seals , penguins , whales) to human? is there or has there been different migration of their normal targets? I have seen docos indicating that water temps are rising / changing + we know there are more humans in the water nowadays.
Please know that I'm not for/against culling - personally I'd be sh!tting jockette and wouldn't be even thinking of aiming a harpoon (bout the only surefire method given size of GW's) I'd be a flying Dog aiming only for the shore or boat fellas.
Prawnhead
Prawnhead
NSW
1317 posts
NSW, 1317 posts
19 Oct 2011 9:49am
BulldogPup said...

Just one question I have is - why have the GW's in particular been drawn to WA in such larger numbers ?, I mean what has changed their normal foodie targets (seals , penguins , whales) to human? is there or has there been different migration of their normal targets? I have seen docos indicating that water temps are rising / changing + we know there are more humans in the water nowadays.


i think they get around a bit !!


www.cmar.csiro.au/tagging/whitesharks/taggedsharks.html
BulldogPup
BulldogPup
6657 posts
6657 posts
19 Oct 2011 7:50am
Cheers Prawny - the whales migrate up past Exmouth every year so probably explains going up that far...... looks like we've got more Whiteys than usual on the lurk this year & more rain too , water has been dirty etc.
Thing with Whiteys is that set of fangs - and that the jaw pops right out of that snout , giant guillotine basically , monstrous bite pressure to boot.
Woodo
Woodo
WA
792 posts
WA, 792 posts
19 Oct 2011 9:35am
subasurf said...

WATER MAN said...

You can't stand any person who has an opinion different to yours and feel you need to abuse their view's and intelligence.



Way to make an assumption, chump.
It's not my fault you get butthurt when I explain to you why you're wrong.

I'm more than happy to argue facts. I could do it all day. Feel free to contribute.



Bit harsh mate.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and it's a bit rough to say someone's opinion is wrong.
We aren't all stating facts on here. Most are just voicing personal opinions.
It is a public forum after all.
Torch
Torch
WA
521 posts
WA, 521 posts
19 Oct 2011 1:42pm
Prawnhead said...

i think they get around a bit !!


www.cmar.csiro.au/tagging/whitesharks/taggedsharks.html


Excellent link Prawn

With all the attacks in populated areas of late, its probably time the government started funding more research projects similar to the "shark men" in Perth waters.

I noticed that most of the sharks tagged were in remote SA. Would it not be better to tag sharks in a populated place to see if they are territorial or "local"?


jbshack
jbshack
WA
6913 posts
WA, 6913 posts
19 Oct 2011 4:45pm
Woodo said...

subasurf said...

WATER MAN said...

You can't stand any person who has an opinion different to yours and feel you need to abuse their view's and intelligence.



Way to make an assumption, chump.
It's not my fault you get butthurt when I explain to you why you're wrong.

I'm more than happy to argue facts. I could do it all day. Feel free to contribute.



Bit harsh mate.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and it's a bit rough to say someone's opinion is wrong.
We aren't all stating facts on here. Most are just voicing personal opinions.
It is a public forum after all.



Your right it is a public forum but a argument of "I think we should cull just cause" Or "For the sake of it to make me feel better" is the attitude that is wrong. As Suba and myself have been trying to explain (suba has better cred's than me) is that we simply can't just kill them all. Sharks are such a substantial part of a bigger than man Eco System that if we start to do that we will soon have more issues than we can deal with.

Sharks have a very important role and the Ocean is already in major problems. IMHO i think we have already signed away more than we can afford.

Its So simple but i will spell it out in bold "WE (MAN) CAN NOT LIVE ON IF THE OCEANS DIE".

So many people think this a shark argument. Its not its a balance of our Oceans because THATS WHAT THE SHARKS DO...

The funniest thing is mans arrogance that we are total control, but really we are useless when it comes to making a difference. We need them, they don't need us.

A great man says "This planet is like a cruise liner hurtling through space. We the humans are the passengers and the Animals and plants are the Crew. How will we live when we have eaten all the crew?"

doggie
doggie
WA
15849 posts
WA, 15849 posts
19 Oct 2011 5:10pm
Do we kill off all the roos as well? -

WA woman walking dogs mauled by a kangaroo

A woman has suffered cuts to her neck, ear and back after a terrifying attack by a kangaroo while she was walking her dogs through bushland in WA's southwest.

Janet Karson of Deanmill near Manjimup, needed more than 20 stitches to her ears after she took on the kangaroo which was attacking her dog.

"I went off the main track and suddenly this big kangaroo jumped out from nowhere and one of my dogs chased after it," she told The West Australian newspaper.

Ms Karson ran after her blue heeler and found it being bear-hugged by the kangaroo.

"I used a stick to lever its claws off my dog and then it reared up in front of me - it was huge," she said.

"All I can remember is its claws going to work on me and the smell of my own blood when my head fell onto its chest."

Ms Karson said after the attack the kangaroo hopped away.

She said it was a miracle that she survived the violence but did not blame the kangaroo.

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/national/8362433/wa-woman-walking-dogs-mauled-by-a-kangaroo
Woodo
Woodo
WA
792 posts
WA, 792 posts
19 Oct 2011 5:16pm
jbshack said...

Woodo said...

subasurf said...

WATER MAN said...

You can't stand any person who has an opinion different to yours and feel you need to abuse their view's and intelligence.



Way to make an assumption, chump.
It's not my fault you get butthurt when I explain to you why you're wrong.

I'm more than happy to argue facts. I could do it all day. Feel free to contribute.



Bit harsh mate.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and it's a bit rough to say someone's opinion is wrong.
We aren't all stating facts on here. Most are just voicing personal opinions.
It is a public forum after all.



Your right it is a public forum but a argument of "I think we should cull just cause" Or "For the sake of it to make me feel better" is the attitude that is wrong. As Suba and myself have been trying to explain (suba has better cred's than me) is that we simply can't just kill them all. Sharks are such a substantial part of a bigger than man Eco System that if we start to do that we will soon have more issues than we can deal with.

Sharks have a very important role and the Ocean is already in major problems. IMHO i think we have already signed away more than we can afford.

Its So simple but i will spell it out in bold "WE (MAN) CAN NOT LIVE ON IF THE OCEANS DIE".

So many people think this a shark argument. Its not its a balance of our Oceans because THATS WHAT THE SHARKS DO...

The funniest thing is mans arrogance that we are total control, but really we are useless when it comes to making a difference. We need them, they don't need us.

A great man says "This planet is like a cruise liner hurtling through space. We the humans are the passengers and the Animals and plants are the Crew. How will we live when we have eaten all the crew?"




My comment actually didn't have anything to do with the GWS but whatever all good. I'm not going to argue about it.

I love and live for the ocean. Always have always will. It's just that some people have different opinions on all aspects of it, as obviously we do on the GWS.

Just don't like to see people get burnt for their opinon, no matter how right or wrong it may be. Maybe that's just me.
That is all.
bakesy
bakesy
WA
682 posts
WA, 682 posts
19 Oct 2011 5:36pm
a number of very valid points being made here, I wonder how we feel about the department that is ultimately responsible for this issue. I have been subjected to the various bans, limit changes and protection zones for the demersal and other species that I target and fully support the ways things have been done over the last 30 years. I personally feel that a massive budget increase is needed in this area and that a percentage of that should go to GWS monitoring and research. The shark patrol is awesome but how good would it be to have a tab on this site that tells us where the GWS are (at least the tagged ones) the tech seen on Shark Men is not perfect but like all tech is going forward in leaps and bounds. Fisheries research needs more personnel and more funds, think about the budget for road safety and council rangers and in a water loving state such as ours it is a disgrace that we don't have something like Shark Men going on. It's pretty obvious that GWS attacks are on the rise so when will we see more being done?
Woodo
Woodo
WA
792 posts
WA, 792 posts
19 Oct 2011 5:43pm
^^^ Totally agree 100%
BulldogPup
BulldogPup
6657 posts
6657 posts
19 Oct 2011 8:45pm
bakesy said...

a number of very valid points being made here, I wonder how we feel about the department that is ultimately responsible for this issue. I have been subjected to the various bans, limit changes and protection zones for the demersal and other species that I target and fully support the ways things have been done over the last 30 years. I personally feel that a massive budget increase is needed in this area and that a percentage of that should go to GWS monitoring and research. The shark patrol is awesome but how good would it be to have a tab on this site that tells us where the GWS are (at least the tagged ones) the tech seen on Shark Men is not perfect but like all tech is going forward in leaps and bounds. Fisheries research needs more personnel and more funds, think about the budget for road safety and council rangers and in a water loving state such as ours it is a disgrace that we don't have something like Shark Men going on. It's pretty obvious that GWS attacks are on the rise so when will we see more being done?


basically these GW's are an animal(fish whatever) following their instincts,that's all it's nothing personal against humans imo , I'm a human (pup whatever) and my instinct is to know more about something , in this case GW's .... I like to get in the water too but these things are around Perth / WA in numbers & SIZE.

Dawn Patrol
Dawn Patrol
WA
1991 posts
WA, 1991 posts
19 Oct 2011 9:31pm
Woodo said...

subasurf said...

WATER MAN said...

You can't stand any person who has an opinion different to yours and feel you need to abuse their view's and intelligence.



Way to make an assumption, chump.
It's not my fault you get butthurt when I explain to you why you're wrong.

I'm more than happy to argue facts. I could do it all day. Feel free to contribute.



Bit harsh mate.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and it's a bit rough to say someone's opinion is wrong.
We aren't all stating facts on here. Most are just voicing personal opinions.
It is a public forum after all.



Everyone is entitled to an opinion. But some people's opinions are 'righter' than others. I don't think anything is wrong with someone telling somebody else their opinion is wrong when it is.
Suba is giving reasonable educated responses.
Lol and when someone's opinion is "Our sharks are out of control." and " KULL...... KULL........ KULL......" ....well, getting bluntly told you're wrong is pretty fair game...
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅