Macroscien said...pweedas said...Yes but this isn't a discussion on religion because those discussions get shut down.
This is a philosophical discussion on the right to freedom of expression.
the word
"discussion" usually refer to activity of presenting different , sometimes opposite opinions ...
possibly due to my poor English I am still missing something
Yes maybe.
Discussions come in a range of formats, from everyone saying the same thing in total agreement, to everyone saying different things in total disagreement, and all points in between.
Discussions where everyone disagrees are usually called arguments, (or sometimes marriage).
Discussions where all sides are logically nonsensical and for the most part unprovable usually turn ferral for the simple reason that noone can present the ultimate proof that their point of view is the correct one. These are usually religious discussions.
Discussions on immigration policies shouldn't fall into that category because ultimately we have thousands of years of recorded history to draw on for prior examples of how particular policies pan out.
So far, it's hard to find any examples of where mixing groups of different ethnicity AND a particular (r word) has worked out with a happy ending in the long term.
The two societies mutually coexist for extended periods slowly building up a backlog of unresolved differences until finally some small incident rips the whole bag open and all the differences which have been papered over for the last XX years all boil over in violence and bloodshed.
