Gutted - What to buy now?

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
marco gribi
marco gribi
WA
196 posts
WA, 196 posts
27 Jul 2008 10:54am
Man, what have Holden done!!!!

My last 3 cars have all been some form of the good old Aussie Holden ute. I am not the only windsurfer that prefers this type of transportation as they are pretty versatile.

So I head off to the local dealer and sus out the new Maloo , after 20 mins talking about the various features I look at the new cabin space behind the seats and think how have they achieved this .

Answer.... They square of the tray, add a tray liner and effectively remove 19cm of length . This has started alarm bells ringing in my head , knowing that in my old ute my wave boards had a nice snug fit. With panic starting to grip me, I head outside grab a board from the car and walk back into the show room and try to squeeze my board into the back of the tray.

After 5 minutes all hope is lost and the reality starts to sink in, I may never get to own my dream car . Not only that but all models of the new ute have the same dimensions.

So what do you go now?



signed: One very unhappy windsurfer

stribo
stribo
QLD
1628 posts
QLD, 1628 posts
27 Jul 2008 1:31pm


swoosh
swoosh
QLD
1929 posts
QLD, 1929 posts
27 Jul 2008 2:28pm
maybe time to get a ford... xr6 or f6 ute could be worth trying. arguably at the moment they come with nicer drivetrain options then the holdens.

but then some people live in a world where its not possible to own a ford.


nobody
nobody
NSW
437 posts
NSW, 437 posts
27 Jul 2008 3:24pm
swoosh said...

maybe time to get a ford... xr6 or f6 ute could be worth trying. arguably at the moment they come with nicer drivetrain options then the holdens.

but then some people live in a world where its not possible to own a ford.




Yeah, I feel sorry for them. Personally I wouldn't buy either as petrol is too expensive these days, and the future of petrol looks bleak.
nobody
nobody
NSW
437 posts
NSW, 437 posts
27 Jul 2008 3:27pm
CJW said...

Go a wagon, you won't look back :D

[Picture of some Falcodore removed]


Is that because the back window is too small, or the thought of how cheap fuel used to be makes you sad?
aus301
aus301
QLD
2039 posts
QLD, 2039 posts
27 Jul 2008 3:37pm
Being someone who in the past has help run a Ute club, and owned Utes to show quality, I know your pain.. I now drive a VS that I'm not happy with and am likely to bite the bullet and just buy a van at some stage.

The reduction in length of the Holden tray was one of the first things I noticed when they brought the new model out (I was invited to the pre sale launch). I too was not happy that I would never get to own one of these, as they have just dropped out of practicality.

Unfortunately the Fords are the same, and really if you are a Holden person through and through you wont end up buying a Ford, just the way it is.

Oh and nicer drive trains than the Holden...I will agree with the 6T, that thing is a beast. But Holden still have it with the LS7 6.0Lt V8 over anything the blue oval boys sell.
Spearsy
Spearsy
SA
213 posts
SA, 213 posts
27 Jul 2008 4:31pm
Just don't get a massive holden or ford sticker on the front or back window cz people can tell what make of car it is.
latedropeddy
latedropeddy
VIC
417 posts
VIC, 417 posts
27 Jul 2008 6:35pm
toyota hilux ute? probably has less depreciation and dare I say it better reliability?
swoosh
swoosh
QLD
1929 posts
QLD, 1929 posts
27 Jul 2008 7:18pm
aus301 said...
Oh and nicer drive trains than the Holden...I will agree with the 6T, that thing is a beast. But Holden still have it with the LS7 6.0Lt V8 over anything the blue oval boys sell.

I think the performance figures say otherwise, weight negates any power advantages :) Unless you buy a W427, but then you would need roof racks hehe. But then some people won't got anywhere near anything thats not a v8, so... Eitherway, I think with the price of fuel at the moment, I'll stick with something smaller, less temptation :D


Rider5
Rider5
WA
567 posts
WA, 567 posts
27 Jul 2008 5:19pm
marco gribi said...


So what do you go now?






Rider5
Rider5
WA
567 posts
WA, 567 posts
27 Jul 2008 5:23pm
Hey Marco, you've got to go the ute !

I can help you
How about a "shorter" custom board
We'll put starboard stickers on it and no one will know
I won't tell a soul....I promise
x sport guy
x sport guy
VIC
110 posts
VIC, 110 posts
27 Jul 2008 9:35pm
fuel consuption aint that bad in the falcons.... had an 05 xr6 ute.... 600 kms round town over 700 on the highway from 70 litres

got an 06 hilux 2.7 petrol now ... cant get much more than 500 round town and no better on the hwy from the same 70 l of juice... despite driving it like a grandpa.... and accelerating at half the speed of the xr..

i reckon some of the v8's would do better than that..maybe some one could verify that

...but as latedropeddy says probly less depreciation and maybe better reliability from the hilux... BUT they are made in thailand now not japan and the build quality is a bit ordinary, so long term reliability.... ummm remains to be seen

and yeah b4 i get shot down i know the xr6 aint in the same power class as any of the v8's but any one buying a v8 has no right to complain about the cost of juice cos it obviously isnt a concern

i reckon wet willy,s got the right idea.... to hell with cars, licences, fuel, rego, parking, fines, parking fines, insurance, servicing, depreciation, yada yada etc etc..... phew.. im outa breath after that rant
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
27 Jul 2008 10:13pm
I dunno if the future of oil is bleak. Australia at the very least has a stack of shale oil which can be made in to petrol up in Queensland.

Commodore utes are show ponies, aren't they? You hardly ever see a tradesman driving one so its hardly surprising that tray size is low on the designers list of priorities. I would have thought their payload is pretty ordinary too.

Three choices, get a van, get a trailer or take up kitesurfing


nobody
nobody
NSW
437 posts
NSW, 437 posts
27 Jul 2008 10:54pm
x sport guy said...

fuel consuption aint that bad in the falcons.... had an 05 xr6 ute.... 600 kms round town over 700 on the highway from 70 litres

got an 06 hilux 2.7 petrol now ... cant get much more than 500 round town and no better on the hwy from the same 70 l of juice... despite driving it like a grandpa.... and accelerating at half the speed of the xr..

i reckon some of the v8's would do better than that..maybe some one could verify that

...but as latedropeddy says probly less depreciation and maybe better reliability from the hilux... BUT they are made in thailand now not japan and the build quality is a bit ordinary, so long term reliability.... ummm remains to be seen

and yeah b4 i get shot down i know the xr6 aint in the same power class as any of the v8's but any one buying a v8 has no right to complain about the cost of juice cos it obviously isnt a concern

i reckon wet willy,s got the right idea.... to hell with cars, licences, fuel, rego, parking, fines, parking fines, insurance, servicing, depreciation, yada yada etc etc..... phew.. im outa breath after that rant

600Km on 70L is 11.67/100Km. Isn't that about what they say they'd get?
Was your manual or auto?
Do you drive it in a hilly area or flat?
How much was it loaded on average?
How did you drive it, with fuel economy in mind or not?

I think Honda have been building Accords in Thailand for some time now.
x sport guy
x sport guy
VIC
110 posts
VIC, 110 posts
27 Jul 2008 11:32pm
not sure what economy ford claimed they would get but around 11+ city and a bit under 10 hwy sounds right

auto

dandy ranges hills and melb eastern suburbs

about 400 - 450 kgs of trade tools and hardware (admitedly about 500-550 in the hilux at the moment)

driven them both with economy in mind but didnt have to work as hard at it in the xr, and it was still twice as quick as the hilux. reckon i could have still got better economy in the xr than i did, if i tried as hard as i am in the hilux

i guess the point i was making is 4 cylinders isnt always cheaper, coz petrol prices seemed to come up a few times in this thread re; bigger cars and falcodores etc.. and someone suggested the hilux (tho they didnt specify petrol or diesel)

and another thing i just remembered is the servicing costs for falcon per km were nearly half that of the hilux petrol, not to mention the couple of dealers ive delt, with in the toyota case they never want to admit anything could possibly be wrong with the car whereas the ford dealer bent over backwards to try and help out with anything, but from what ive heard, experiences with dealers can vary greatly irrespective of brand
nobody
nobody
NSW
437 posts
NSW, 437 posts
28 Jul 2008 12:06am
x sport guy said...

not sure what economy ford claimed they would get but around 11+ city and a bit under 10 hwy sounds right

auto

dandy ranges hills and melb eastern suburbs

about 400 - 450 kgs of trade tools and hardware (admitedly about 500-550 in the hilux at the moment)

driven them both with economy in mind but didnt have to work as hard at it in the xr, and it was still twice as quick as the hilux. reckon i could have still got better economy in the xr than i did, if i tried as hard as i am in the hilux

i guess the point i was making is 4 cylinders isnt always cheaper, coz petrol prices seemed to come up a few times in this thread re; bigger cars and falcodores etc.. and someone suggested the hilux (tho they didnt specify petrol or diesel)

and another thing i just remembered is the servicing costs for falcon per km were nearly half that of the hilux petrol, not to mention the couple of dealers ive delt, with in the toyota case they never want to admit anything could possibly be wrong with the car whereas the ford dealer bent over backwards to try and help out with anything, but from what ive heard, experiences with dealers can vary greatly irrespective of brand

I agree the engine size isn't the only factor. Is the Hilux 2WD or 4WD? What does it weigh?

A friend or mine owned a four cylinder Hilux 4WD many years ago and I had an old Falcon 6 ute. They got about he same fuel economy. The Hilux and the ute were about the same weight.

Having said that, I have a '95 4 cylinder manual Camry which I took from Sydney to the Blue Mountains (so almost all highway) with 2 people, 2 kids and tools. Towed a trailer most of the time. Did 819Km on a tank which was about 60-63L since I didn't run out (didn't use the same pump to refill). That would be 7.7L/100Km at worst or 7.3L/100Km at best.

So that is why I'm thinking the Hilux is probably a heavy 4WD version with short gearing, bigger wheels and tyres (rotating weight counts twice in acceleration) and higher wind drag.
x sport guy
x sport guy
VIC
110 posts
VIC, 110 posts
28 Jul 2008 12:32am
nobody said...

x sport guy said...

not sure what economy ford claimed they would get but around 11+ city and a bit under 10 hwy sounds right

auto

dandy ranges hills and melb eastern suburbs

about 400 - 450 kgs of trade tools and hardware (admitedly about 500-550 in the hilux at the moment)

driven them both with economy in mind but didnt have to work as hard at it in the xr, and it was still twice as quick as the hilux. reckon i could have still got better economy in the xr than i did, if i tried as hard as i am in the hilux

i guess the point i was making is 4 cylinders isnt always cheaper, coz petrol prices seemed to come up a few times in this thread re; bigger cars and falcodores etc.. and someone suggested the hilux (tho they didnt specify petrol or diesel)

and another thing i just remembered is the servicing costs for falcon per km were nearly half that of the hilux petrol, not to mention the couple of dealers ive delt, with in the toyota case they never want to admit anything could possibly be wrong with the car whereas the ford dealer bent over backwards to try and help out with anything, but from what ive heard, experiences with dealers can vary greatly irrespective of brand

I agree the engine size isn't the only factor. Is the Hilux 2WD or 4WD? What does it weigh?

A friend or mine owned a four cylinder Hilux 4WD many years ago and I had an old Falcon 6 ute. They got about he same fuel economy. The Hilux and the ute were about the same weight.

Having said that, I have a '95 4 cylinder manual Camry which I took from Sydney to the Blue Mountains (so almost all highway) with four people and tools. Towed a trailer most of the time. Did 819Km on a tank which was about 60-63L since I didn't run out (didn't use the same pump to refill). That would be 7.7L/100Km at worst or 7.3L/100Km at best.

So that is why I'm thinking the Hilux is probably a heavy 4WD version with short gearing, bigger wheels and tyres (rotating weight counts twice in acceleration) and higher wind drag.



nope.. hilux is 2wd "workmate" basic model with 195 x 14 cheese cutters on it inflated to 43 - 45 psi
last time at tip weighbridge 2220 kgs, fairly similar to xr's total loaded weight

sure the hilux isnt as slippery through the air as a falcodore or camry would be which would explain the distinct lack of improvement in hwy consumption over city driving, but someone suggested the hilux and i figured its worth pointing out coz all 4cyl hilux's are going to be similar

ex misses had exact same ute with same economy as mine,

current misses has hyundai lantra wagon 2.0ltr and she reckons bout the same economy as my hilux but im not totally sure how she came to that conclusion.. she is a bit of a lead foot but doesnt beleive me when i tell her
Spearsy
Spearsy
SA
213 posts
SA, 213 posts
28 Jul 2008 12:39am
I have a subaru wrx wagon I can fit two boards and all my gear inside, or if I have a passenger the boards can go on the roof. The car is way better on fuel than a v6 or v8 and leaves them for dead.
nobody
nobody
NSW
437 posts
NSW, 437 posts
28 Jul 2008 1:59am
x sport guy said...

...

nope.. hilux is 2wd "workmate" basic model with 195 x 14 cheese cutters on it inflated to 43 - 45 psi
last time at tip weighbridge 2220 kgs, fairly similar to xr's total loaded weight

sure the hilux isnt as slippery through the air as a falcodore or camry would be which would explain the distinct lack of improvement in hwy consumption over city driving, but someone suggested the hilux and i figured its worth pointing out coz all 4cyl hilux's are going to be similar

ex misses had exact same ute with same economy as mine,

current misses has hyundai lantra wagon 2.0ltr and she reckons bout the same economy as my hilux but im not totally sure how she came to that conclusion.. she is a bit of a lead foot but doesnt beleive me when i tell her

After doing some seaching I found the scary reality. The Falcon auto ute has better combined fuel economy than the 2.7L manual Hilux like you said. The only major factor I can think of is the Hilux is short geared so spends a larger amount of time at higher revs than the Falcon. Thanks for enlightening us x sport guy.
http://www.redbook.com.au/used-cars/details.aspx?__No=30&R=102094&__Nne=15&Cr=1&title=2006%20Toyota%20TGN16R%20MY07%20Hilux%20Workmate%20(Aug)&__N=0+4294942755+4294966575+4294965618&__sid=11B658C1CB62&__Ns=p_Make_String|0||p_ClassificationType_String|0||p_Family_String|0||p_Year_String|1||p_SequenceNum_Int32|0

www.redbook.com.au/used-cars/details.aspx?__No=90&R=58326&__Nne=15&Cr=13&title=2006%20Ford%20BF%20Falcon%20XR6%20Super%20Cab%20&__N=0+4294961316+4294965982+4294965618&__sid=11B658C1CB62&__Ns=p_Make_String|0||p_ClassificationType_String|0||p_Family_String|0||p_Year_String|1||p_SequenceNum_Int32|0
nobody
nobody
NSW
437 posts
NSW, 437 posts
28 Jul 2008 2:06am
Spearsy said...

I have a subaru wrx wagon I can fit two boards and all my gear inside, or if I have a passenger the boards can go on the roof. The car is way better on fuel than a v6 or v8 and leaves them for dead.

Are you sure? The combined figure is only slightly better than the XR6.

http://www.redbook.com.au/used-cars/details.aspx?__Nne=15&title=2006%20Subaru%20S%20MY06%20Impreza%20WRX%20&R=98437&__Ns=p_Make_String|0||p_ClassificationType_String|0||p_Family_String|0||p_Year_String|1||p_SequenceNum_Int32|0&__N=0+4294944089+4294967163+4294965618&__sid=11B658C1CB62&Cr=12
marco gribi
marco gribi
WA
196 posts
WA, 196 posts
28 Jul 2008 10:27am
I am a Holden man through and through and would never contemplate purchasing any other brand of car.

Rider 5, I might have to seriously consider your proposal I would require a board at about 215cm, floats a 77kg person and excels in all conditions. Lets even try an new twin fin design, what am I saying you know the deal .

So my thoughts are now drifting towards the new Holden wagon in the SS V. I am not overly worried about fuel / running costs, the misses and I don't intend on having kids so I get to spend more money on toys.

Actually I was informed by the HSV dealer that they will release a wagon version in early October (ahhh!!! another dream to grasp onto).
Rider5
Rider5
WA
567 posts
WA, 567 posts
28 Jul 2008 4:25pm
Ooh I've got another idea remember tose shrinky dink toys you would put in the oven and they would shrink or chip and chocolate block wrappers would do the same.
.....................well maybe you could put your board in a huge oven and shrink it I'm sure it will still say 77 litres on it
grumplestiltskin
grumplestiltskin
WA
2331 posts
WA, 2331 posts
28 Jul 2008 4:51pm
marco gribi said...

I am a Holden man through and through and would never contemplate purchasing any other brand of car.

Rider 5, I might have to seriously consider your proposal I would require a board at about 215cm, floats a 77kg person and excels in all conditions. Lets even try an new twin fin design, what am I saying you know the deal .

So my thoughts are now drifting towards the new Holden wagon in the SS V. I am not overly worried about fuel / running costs, the misses and I don't intend on having kids so I get to spend more money on toys.

Actually I was informed by the HSV dealer that they will release a wagon version in early October (ahhh!!! another dream to grasp onto).


Marco, the wagons have already been released (check your local dealer)

BUT

surprise, surprise, they are shorter inside that the previous models as well, so you will end up with the boards jammed through between the seats, which is OK if you dont mind sand and saltwater inside your nice new wagon
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
28 Jul 2008 6:54pm
Holden designers put form before function.

On reason why the previous model Commodore was good was because it had a huge arse on it, just what you want for a wagon. If you want style, buy a coupe.

P.C_simpson
P.C_simpson
WA
1492 posts
WA, 1492 posts
28 Jul 2008 4:55pm
or you could just use the work van....
marco gribi
marco gribi
WA
196 posts
WA, 196 posts
28 Jul 2008 7:13pm
Yeah I know the new wagon is out I have checked it out several times.

I really wanted the new Maloo and was waiting for the series 2 to come out, then it was shopping time.

Now I am looking at a wagon again and it just ****s me that it will get trashed inside with all the sand and salt water (been there done that years ago). I think its going to be my only choice though, I still like all the comforts and a car that drives well and I just plain love V8's. Also I am not into any 4wd's, just would not use it enough and around town they suck.

Hey P.C, the work van is ok for in and around Perth and the odd weekender to Lano or Gero. However when I go on holidays or longer trips it has to stay at work.
mr love
mr love
VIC
2421 posts
VIC, 2421 posts
28 Jul 2008 11:08pm
Sorry Marco , I am the lone Windsurfer at holden design , and try to protect us as much as possible . On this one the marketing boys were insistant on more rear interior storage and as you noted the only way to get it was reduce bed length. The bed length isn't a huge issue with most ute customers , so i was never going to win that one . Unfortunately Windsurfing isn't on the Radar as far as Marketing cars goes.
I tried !!!!
Rider5
Rider5
WA
567 posts
WA, 567 posts
28 Jul 2008 10:57pm
mr love said...

Sorry Marco , I am the lone Windsurfer at holden design , and try to protect us as much as possible . On this one the marketing boys were insistant on more rear interior storage and as you noted the only way to get it was reduce bed length. The bed length isn't a huge issue with most ute customers , so i was never going to win that one . Unfortunately Windsurfing isn't on the Radar as far as Marketing cars goes.
I tried !!!!


Mr Love, Can you tell em Rider5 says it's a ute! A freekin ute! and the idea of a ute is to carry as much in the back as possible! not inside but outside.
nobody
nobody
NSW
437 posts
NSW, 437 posts
29 Jul 2008 1:04am
Rider5 said...

...

Mr Love, Can you tell em Rider5 says it's a ute! A freekin ute! and the idea of a ute is to carry as much in the back as possible! not inside but outside.

I agree. If they want to keep more inside, buy a lockable hard-cover or get a wagon. Not that anyone is going to listen to us.
Mobydisc
Mobydisc
NSW
9029 posts
NSW, 9029 posts
29 Jul 2008 8:35am
When was the last time you saw a Commodore ute? Now when was the last time you saw a Commodore ute carrying something?

Holden marketing is right on the money. Their utes are not used for carrying things, they are show ponies.
stonesurf
stonesurf
WA
77 posts
WA, 77 posts
29 Jul 2008 12:32pm
Hey Marco, how about a flash custom ali tray on it. You could get it extended then.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅