What do we need to do. Firstly, we need to get rid of this hypocritical idea that the ocean is their territory, if you believe this, then recognise that where you live was originally Dugite or Tiger snake territory, so let them live inside your house and coil up on your bed. Secondly, we need to understand that sharks are fish. Everyday tons of fish are caught both commercially and recreationally off our coast. But for some reason killing a shark that has recently attacked a person is not acceptable. Thirdly, shark deterrent devices need to be critically reviewed, I cannot understand how a shark, the length and weight of a car without brakes, that is moving into attack a surfer at 40-50 km/h, will stop within the 2m distance between when it senses the electrical field before it hits the human. What is needed is a deterrent that works before the shark starts to move in for a kill, or preferably makes the shark avoid the area entirely.
I agree on both of these points. Perhaps if we were a more environmentally conscious species then could you argue that the ocean is their territory, but most of us couldn't give a **** and those that are vocal about protecting various animals are most likely hypocritical with hidden, flawed agendas. I don't think we should actively hunt Great Whites and reduce their population to the point they no longer pose a threat, but their numbers need to be reduced and better shark deterrents need to be developed, ones that are 100% effective. Also what happens in the situation a surfer is wearing a shark shield, but others aren't? Surely ol ravenous Whitey is just going to go for them instead?Also note in WA there have been quite a few swimmers and surfers that have disappeared, "presumed drowned" over the years. So the actual number of fatal attacks is most likely higher.
