TalkToMe said..
I've just re-read the entire four pages and picked out a few lines that stood out:
"(Prices are high) Like in sailboarding, (due to) the sponsored riders with their hands out, and everyone else trying to make some $ out of a passion, force up the final selling price."
"Cheap , cheap , cheap the majority will always go the cheapest. the smart ones go for middle of the road the one percenters go for the top"
"SUP may be heading the same way as sailboarding. Bought my first wave riding board and rig for $1200 within a few years everything went high tech and just a hull was $2000 then the rig was extra on top of that. During the late eighties there would be 60 sailboarders at Cronulla or Gerroa on a good day. Now just a handful. Hope SUP doesn't go that way because of pricing."
"So what happened here (South Africa) was that everyone became an importer - we must have at leat 30-40 brands in a tiny market with most selling less than 20-40 boards a year. It's clearly not enough to make a living but it is giving the customers options outside of the bigger established brands.
"The only way to really cut costs is to reduce the links in the distribution chain - IMO this is a very dangerous route as it means local retailers will fall by the wayside and customers will be forced to shop online and straight out of garages or smaller warehouses.
So it looks like the standard distribution model of manufacturer/brand/importer/retailer isn't ideal as this sets the prices generally too high.
Knowing that a few, or even a lot individuals in some markets, have started their own brand and have started selling straight from the importer level and in turn removing the retailer and their $400-$800 markup and more with some models. Customers are in turn willing to buy a brand with no community/history/brand value. So with that, is the big brand distribution model really working for all? There are so many brands out there that every Tom, Dick and Harry thinks they can sell SUPs.
Furthermore, it seems that most people don't want to pay over 2K for anything or even $1200 - $1500 for an Al Rounder. Would you agree?
All said and done, it seems it is hard to make a buck in the SUP market. And that is in a so-called rising trend. That is a little concerning.
Any thoughts?
Hey TTM,
I agree with your thoughts. I think that SUP is going to see a fairly large implosion. I think you can predict the path of SUP by comparing it to windsurfing, and snowboarding, Penny skateboards and Razor Scooters, only difference is that SUP is going to boom and cool in less than half of the time.
We are going to see dozens of people lose a small fortune as they jumped on the gravy train and bought themselves a container of cheap Chinese SUP's and have now realized that the road "paved with gold" was really just yellow paint.
SUP will always be around, but I think it will make a really interesting doco in time showing a spectacular rise to prominence and an equally rapid cooling.
I think there is a major reset coming as all the part timers and cheapies get out and lick their financial wounds. The local shapers will prosper and so long as they stay with custom shapes and locally made to order boards, they will be fine. The big boys mass producing? .... hmmmm, not sure, but the market can't handle the ever increasing prices, the plateauing numbers of paddlers and the oversupply of both brands and models. Perhaps the big boys have enough to offer in the lower end of their ranges to keep the masses happy. This may require a re-education for the mass buying public and a dramatic improvement in the quality and build in the lower end boards. The stuff I have seen at the dealer meetings has been promising.
Don't mean to be pessimistic just calling it as I see it.
DM