excal36 said..
I sailed on a Swanson 28 on a Wednesday race, the boat was owned by Laurie Mitchell sailmaker crewed by ken and Jim Swanson . The sailmaker complained about the design the two crews complained about the sails.A very funny day but also a day in which u could not help but learn.
The Swanson 42 in the 76 Hobart was cutter rigged with 12 crew and had not raced before.
The same boat raced in 79 and finished a lot higher up the fleet.
There were two in 1976; the new boat (which I know) and another, which finished just ahead and then sank in the 1998 Hobart. The 1979 race was famously fluky and the S42 was still beaten across the line by displacement half tonners, two long-keel planked '50s- '60s design around 36ft long (Orani and Christine), other longer keelers from the '60s (Mercedes III, the steel Adria), a steel Adams 45 cruiser, some S&S 34s, two Swanson 36s, a Jarkan 10.5, Dunco 37, etc etc etc.
The same boat raced in 1980 and finished behind both Swanson 36s, a Swano 32, S&S 34s, a Jarkan 10.5, steel cruisers like the Adams 45, and a load of boats like East Coast 31s and Currawongs. The first "fast cruiser" of anything like comparable size, a 46 footer, was 21 hours ahead of the Swano. A 42 footer that finishes hours behind a cruiser/racer from the same designer than is 10 ft shorter and a few years older is not really a fast boat. The same boat finished well back in the 1979 Noumea race.
None of this is criticising the boat, it's being realistic. As a simile, I loved my 1977 Kombi Campervan, but no one would ever call it fast. There's nothing wrong with boats that are a bit slow, but surely we should recognise it.