best wakestyle boards

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
sir ROWDY
sir ROWDY
WA
5378 posts
WA, 5378 posts
4 Dec 2014 8:29am
default said..

Wallis1986 said..
Thats good to know. think its the original pop. black with pink n blue patterns on it, blue bottom.



I actually prefer the look of the old pop. Quite like the basic graphics personally.. Anyways solid board choice.

Anyone (besides rowdy ;) had a go on the new Tranq or Billy? I know theyve changed a bit this year. Saw a guy out at SB/pond on the Billy the other day..

If you're wondering main changes are;

- Tiniest bit more rocker
- Better slider base
- Nicer rail finish

Besides that they will be pretty much the same to ride as the 014 models. I really liked how they worked, no point changing them until we have something better to release .
juicerider
juicerider
WA
790 posts
WA, 790 posts
4 Dec 2014 9:46am
Y
default said

Anyone (besides rowdy ;) had a go on the new Tranq or Billy? I know theyve changed a bit this year. Saw a guy out at SB/pond on the Billy the other day..


Yeah NickT's got the new Billy atm but he cant ride it. I took it out for a session at the pond and at Pinnas last week to see how it went.
Nice board but it felt quite big. Was great at the pond, and it may be that I need to widen the stance, but in the chop of pinnas it felt too big for me.
sir ROWDY
sir ROWDY
WA
5378 posts
WA, 5378 posts
4 Dec 2014 10:17am
How tall/ heavy are you?

I don't suggest anyone to put the stance on the widest setting with 6inch baseplates, the only reason those holes are there is to accomodate older baseplates and also to make the inserts stronger as the optimal stance is the middle setting.
juicerider
juicerider
WA
790 posts
WA, 790 posts
4 Dec 2014 10:36am
I think it was set up on the second from the narrowest. Im 1.8M btw and about 77kg
NickT
NickT
WA
1094 posts
WA, 1094 posts
4 Dec 2014 4:30pm
Was set to the narrowest, which is 10 mm narrower than the pops second widest. Not sure it's set right yet as I rode it at cable for the first ride then trashed my arm. Felt good there but there is still plenty of board to go wider, if the legs will take it!
NickT
NickT
WA
1094 posts
WA, 1094 posts
4 Dec 2014 5:20pm
Was set to the narrowest, which is 10 mm narrower than the pops second widest. Not sure it's set right yet as I rode it at cable for the first ride then trashed my arm. Felt good there but there is still plenty of board to go wider, if the legs will take it!
Drury
Drury
NSW
502 posts
NSW, 502 posts
4 Dec 2014 9:29pm
You'll dig the Pop. It's an easy shape to transition to as it only has around 45mm rocker and nice grippy channels. It's also bombproof which is wonderful. Just about the only board I haven't broken. The weight thing is honestly only noticeable to people that do tricks with their kites high. It makes it harder to pull up into passes (i.e. makes it harder to dangle tricks). If you go into a trick with a lot of speed and your kite in the right position you will find the swing weight to be helpful. Hope you enjoy you new ride! Lots of good options out there nowadays loving how into wakestyle companies are getting
sir ROWDY
sir ROWDY
WA
5378 posts
WA, 5378 posts
4 Dec 2014 6:31pm
Ok, sounds like it's the right size board for you if you are used to riding bindings/ wakeboards.

I would however suggest to run it on the middle stance, the narrowest stance will make the board feel pretty big and harder to set an edge. If you had the 137 I would say the narrowest setting is an option.
juicerider
juicerider
WA
790 posts
WA, 790 posts
5 Dec 2014 9:14am
^^^^^
Yeah that's what I thought. Now I just got to ask NickT to let me use it again and screw around with his bindings
Interestingly enough, even though I felt uncomfortable on it I was landing more consistently than I normally would
kiteboardrob
kiteboardrob
QLD
28 posts
QLD, 28 posts
6 Dec 2014 10:03am
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅