The Funny Images Thread

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
hargs
hargs
QLD
634 posts
QLD, 634 posts
21 Jun 2015 12:06pm







hargs
hargs
QLD
634 posts
QLD, 634 posts
21 Jun 2015 10:08pm



and to to the previous posters it's the funny image thread, if you don't like it don't log on.







here's a bit of lou to make you really think

jn1
jn1
SA
2753 posts
jn1 jn1
SA, 2753 posts
21 Jun 2015 9:40pm



Kamikuza
Kamikuza
QLD
6493 posts
QLD, 6493 posts
21 Jun 2015 10:23pm
hargs said..



and to to the previous posters it's the funny image thread, if you don't like it don't log on.


I think terry or lofty has a new log in...
Spark
Spark
WA
224 posts
WA, 224 posts
21 Jun 2015 10:27pm
Kamikuza said...
hargs said..



and to to the previous posters it's the funny image thread, if you don't like it don't log on.


I think terry or lofty has a new log in...


Must be lofty. Terry would be pimping ozone.
Stubbies
Stubbies
WA
1126 posts
WA, 1126 posts
22 Jun 2015 6:52am



felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
22 Jun 2015 9:08am
Water temperature sign on a french beach



Spocktek
Spocktek
WA
281 posts
WA, 281 posts
22 Jun 2015 6:34pm




hargs
hargs
QLD
634 posts
QLD, 634 posts
22 Jun 2015 9:00pm



Macroscien
Macroscien
QLD
6809 posts
QLD, 6809 posts
23 Jun 2015 12:49am




once you see the picture you are never going to forget this law of physics
japie
japie
NSW
7146 posts
NSW, 7146 posts
23 Jun 2015 8:48am




hargs
hargs
QLD
634 posts
QLD, 634 posts
23 Jun 2015 10:16am



seapig
seapig
TAS
71 posts
TAS, 71 posts
23 Jun 2015 11:45am
Thats the best description of the E - I - R and ohms law i have seen in thirty eight years of trying to explain it to the 'lay' person.
And by the way, It is correct.
myusernam
myusernam
QLD
6158 posts
QLD, 6158 posts
23 Jun 2015 12:51pm
seapig said..
Thats the best description of the E - I - R and ohms law i have seen in thirty eight years of trying to explain it to the 'lay' person. And by the way, It is correct.



oh no it isn't. You must be an electrician. they teach 'conventional'current flow. The volts should be on the right, looking pretty/ attractive. current flows from earth to the potential. Not the other way around.

but still a good explanation for the laypoerson
ThinkaBowtit
ThinkaBowtit
WA
1134 posts
WA, 1134 posts
23 Jun 2015 10:56am



hargs
hargs
QLD
634 posts
QLD, 634 posts
23 Jun 2015 12:59pm







seanhogan
seanhogan
QLD
3424 posts
QLD, 3424 posts
23 Jun 2015 2:40pm



nebbian
nebbian
WA
6277 posts
WA, 6277 posts
23 Jun 2015 1:32pm
myusernam said..


seapig said..
Thats the best description of the E - I - R and ohms law i have seen in thirty eight years of trying to explain it to the 'lay' person. And by the way, It is correct.





oh no it isn't. You must be an electrician. they teach 'conventional'current flow. The volts should be on the right, looking pretty/ attractive. current flows from earth to the potential. Not the other way around.

but still a good explanation for the laypoerson



Current is taken as flowing from positive to negative, even though the electrons might be flowing the other way. So the diagram is correct.

Best diagram ever, btw
jusavina
jusavina
QLD
1504 posts
QLD, 1504 posts
23 Jun 2015 8:48pm
Not sure if that the right thread or heavy weather but I post it anyway...





Haircut
Haircut
QLD
6491 posts
QLD, 6491 posts
24 Jun 2015 12:56am
nebbian said..

Current is taken as flowing from positive to negative, even though the electrons might be flowing the other way


interesting

like myusername, I was ejumikated to ignore the conventional current flow diagrams on the components as it was now (then) considered defunct, electron current flow was gospel, and learn to read/diagnose the circuit in reverse (1990-1991)

maybe it's like english, where one teacher tells you it's okay to start a sentence with "But or And" and another says it's a no no
Ted the Kiwi
Ted the Kiwi
NSW
14256 posts
NSW, 14256 posts
24 Jun 2015 1:06am



Macroscien
Macroscien
QLD
6809 posts
QLD, 6809 posts
24 Jun 2015 1:19am
Haircut said..




nebbian said..

Current is taken as flowing from positive to negative, even though the electrons might be flowing the other way






interesting

like myusername, I was ejumikated to ignore the conventional current flow diagrams on the components as it was now (then) considered defunct, electron current flow was gospel, and learn to read/diagnose the circuit in reverse (1990-1991)

maybe it's like english, where one teacher tells you it's okay to start a sentence with "But or And" and another says it's a no no





To quiet the quarrel about current I may only say that maybe yours misunderstanding come from assumption that only electrons are responsible for current, but there are electrolytes, plasma, and semiconductors....(?) so that is simply convention, agreed status quo
Stubbies
Stubbies
WA
1126 posts
WA, 1126 posts
24 Jun 2015 6:54am



whillie
whillie
5 posts
5 posts
24 Jun 2015 7:37am
Ahh, fellers so much talk about current , what do I know about current! when I turn the switch on the light comes on "current" simple.........
Ian K
Ian K
WA
4169 posts
WA, 4169 posts
24 Jun 2015 8:47am
Yes the first guess was the wrong way around. But i agree with Macro. Current is current, doesn't matter whether it's negative electrons or positive holes, ( unless you're designing a revolutionary semi-conductor I suppose?). But these days wouldn't most current be in semi-conductors? As positive holes? In which case the first guess was right after all? Thought I had this sorted, now I don't know, thanks Macro.

For once youtube doesn't help.



Hands up who focused on the red wire looking for the first electron.
felixdcat
felixdcat
WA
3519 posts
WA, 3519 posts
24 Jun 2015 9:04am
happytimes said..
look put it to bed
they were wrong about the flow of current
they were wrong about the magnetic properties of voltage
they know this now, but mass correction was rendered as unnecessary as it makes no difference to the math and it seems to confuse some
as for marcos assertion that current is not always the flow of electrons. .....well, unless you've discovered matter on this planet that isnt made up of atoms.......what's that, oh you havent discovered that yet, then current is still only made up as a measure of columbs which is a measure of electrons flowing past a point......
end of lesson


I am not sure what are you ranting about but you sir did well for your first post collecting that many red thumbs! I am sure even Milsy and Logman did not perform that good!
Gizmo
Gizmo
SA
2865 posts
SA, 2865 posts
24 Jun 2015 11:14am
FFS isn't this the 'Funny Image' thread NOT high school electrical class?
rod_bunny
rod_bunny
WA
1089 posts
WA, 1089 posts
24 Jun 2015 11:23am
Ian K said..
Hands up who focused on the red wire looking for the first electron.



Was that a Higgs Boson shooting off to the left?





Rails
Rails
QLD
1371 posts
QLD, 1371 posts
24 Jun 2015 1:41pm



pineapple
pineapple
SA
28 posts
SA, 28 posts
24 Jun 2015 2:20pm
Haircut said..

nebbian said..

Current is taken as flowing from positive to negative, even though the electrons might be flowing the other way



interesting

like myusername, I was ejumikated to ignore the conventional current flow diagrams on the components as it was now (then) considered defunct, electron current flow was gospel, and learn to read/diagnose the circuit in reverse (1990-1991)

maybe it's like english, where one teacher tells you it's okay to start a sentence with "But or And" and another says it's a no no


Eh? Where were you ekjumikated that? When was it considered defunct? I've got a piece of paper somewhere that says I qualified as an Electrical/Electronic Engineer in 2001 and it certainly wasn't defunct then.

Positive current, by convention, is the rate of flow of positive charge, that's all there is to it.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅