JP Supersport 109

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
ESM
ESM
19 posts
ESM ESM
19 posts
20 Jan 2014 11:33pm
I am looking at buying one of these and thought I would ask for some feedback on what works or does not work for this board. I have a Supersport 93 liter which turns nicely, but is not as fast as I thought it would be. Thanks for the help.
jn1
jn1
SA
2753 posts
jn1 jn1
SA, 2753 posts
21 Jan 2014 8:52pm
Yeah, Ilove mine. Owned it for over a year now. It's probably not to best performing board, but it's very rugged, gybes very easy. This is my big light/moderate wind board and over fragile performance boards. This board is much more practical.

easty
easty
TAS
2213 posts
TAS, 2213 posts
24 Jan 2014 8:11pm
ESM, I have a 2012 109l SS, it's a great board.
As to what works, well for me at around 72-74kg, this is my light / medium wind board. Mainly sailed with a 6.6 KA Koyote (no cam free ride sail), and 34cm fin. Planes quickly, gybes nicely, enough width to tack easily when not planing, enjoyable ride, and fast. It would get some good speed with a cammed sail and some skill. There's not much in the bottom shape slowing it down.


ESM
ESM
19 posts
ESM ESM
19 posts
24 Jan 2014 9:38pm
Thanks for the feedback jn1 and easty, it is very appreciated. Does the lack of shape on the bottom make chop an issue?
easty
easty
TAS
2213 posts
TAS, 2213 posts
25 Jan 2014 1:08pm
I'm guessing that there will always be a trade-off between design for speed and comfort in chop. Width also plays a part.
I haven't found the SS too bad, but my CA SL55 is way way way better in choppy stuff, probably because it is 10cm narrower, and other design "things".
I haven't sailed anything of comparable size to my SS 109 to compare.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅