Here a comparison between M8 (Beitian BN280), M9 (Beitian BK180) and M10 (Bainianxing BU-1025)
Car drive ca 1h, 3 ESP-GPS under the windscreen.
Settings 10 Hz, 3 gnss GPS+GLONAS+GALILEO.
The M8/M10 received more then 20 sats, the M9 max 16 sats. So even with 3 gnss enabled, the M9 is limited to 16 sats !
Lowest error values for the M10, highest values for the M9.
The M10 suffered with lost points : Observed time distribution (in ms): 100ms 39769, 200ms 763
M8/M9 had no lost points. (slow sd card ?).
M8 : 84.063 km/h avg 5_best_runs
M9 : 84.055 km/h avg 5_best_runs
M10 : 84.051 km/h avg 5_best_runs
Link to the 3 gpy files :
drive.google.com/drive/folders/1gjXHP1jbuGeQsr_X5KYTNxGHAZ-68SZF?usp=sharing My opinion : if you don't need 20 Hz, stay with the M10 !
However, in the next update the M9 will be supported.
Greetings, Jan.
M8_ROM3bn_2306101315.gpy - blue
M9_ublox_2306101315.gpy - red
M10_Ali_2306101315.gpy - green