Huge Marina for Brighton Le Sands

> 10 years ago
Reply
Register to post, see what you've read, and subscribe to topics.
DavMen
DavMen
NSW
1510 posts
NSW, 1510 posts
9 Nov 2006 8:29am
I heard today on the radio of a proposal from the local council to build a huge marina at Brighton Le Sands - this can't be good for the local windsurfing community - anyboby know anything more about this?

DavMen
Brett Morris
Brett Morris
NSW
1204 posts
NSW, 1204 posts
9 Nov 2006 9:57am
Yes, this has been noticed and the ball is rolling to assess what it could mean to the local windsurfing community. This could be a great opportunity for windsurfing in NSW as the council is very keen to develop the area's natural activities, but it could easily be a total disaster to Sydney most consistent sailing area. Development proposal is on the Rockdale Council web site....
FormulaNova
FormulaNova
WA
15100 posts
WA, 15100 posts
9 Nov 2006 8:50am
The local papers have shown this a few times, and it looks like Rockdale council is just trying to make itself look important. I don't see how a marina there is going to make the place any better. If anything it will just ruin the environment for people that picnic there and possibly us.

I don't think there really has been that much thought put into how this affects recreational users of the bay.

As it is, parking there is a nightmare, especially when you consider that the Grand Parade is main road running right through the middle and during peak hour it can be crazy. Why add even more cars?

The thing that I worry about is that if you ask the casual, non-windsurfing, non-boating, non-fisherman, non-picnicer, they probably think it is a wonderful idea.
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
9 Nov 2006 10:54am
well... I guess it's time to say goodbye to one of Sydney's premiere windsurf spots.

If you take a look at the council brochure page 8 you can see that the seawall of the marina will reach just past the Shell gas station at Kyeemagh. (URL: http://www.rockdale.nsw.gov.au/Web+Applications/destinationsNew.nsf/Home)

This will mean a southerly will be blocked by the pier and the 7 story monstrosity stitting on top of the pier. Not to mention the boat traffic and pollution which will come with it.

Parking will probably be either non existent or will cost money.

The upshot is that no one will give a rats about a bunch of windsurfers. They build the seawall down at Windang despite protests by local surfers and windsurfers and they will build this pier + marina. Especially since this is part of larger redevelopment plan for Brighton.

The next thing will be some rich people moving into the proposed 7 story marina complex and complain about the airport noise. (same happened at Luna Park)... oh, and never mind the water polution after a big storm.


Cheer Cheer
Cheer Cheer
NSW
36 posts
NSW, 36 posts
9 Nov 2006 2:54pm
Not to mention the desalination plant at Kurnell which will probably have some impact on sailing at Botany and maybe even at Wanda and the proposed extension of Port Botany which will impact sailing on the other side and almost whole of Botany Bay will be lost to sailing. Well at least no more umming and ahhing about whether to take the drive down south or get frustrated at Longy....
Boris
Boris
261 posts
261 posts
9 Nov 2006 12:39pm
What is it with all the "Sailing-spot-f**king" construction lately??
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
9 Nov 2006 1:21pm
boris, it's called corporate greed...
... I don't see how any corporate developments like that will make your average persons life any better. It sounds too me like a massive development put in place by council men with inflated egos all corpurted , ahm I mean supported by a number of large developers. When you look at the planning submissions alone I would say they have already spend in the millions just for the proposal. The entire project would cost in billions.

I also wouldn't be surprised if there is already a plan in place to move the airport by 2020... who knows, if the impact of climate change is as bad as predicted there probably won't be any motorboats or jet skis around anymore by then.

Next to go should be Coronation Beach followed by the Club Med development down at Gerroa... mark my words.
Kremlin
Kremlin
418 posts
418 posts
9 Nov 2006 1:59pm
Comrades
This is very sad news for certain yar ?
Maybe you must be coming up north for sailing for sure.
It is very lonely sailing in consistent head high plus surf and 18 knot + north easterly up this way all the time.
But I am for thinking you will not be liking of the clean unpoluted water up this way for certain yar !
Cheer Cheer
Cheer Cheer
NSW
36 posts
NSW, 36 posts
9 Nov 2006 5:01pm
Mind you, better a club med than 500 Appartments or medium density housing like up at Kingscliff. But I thought someone mentioning that it is a Golf resort that is planned for the stretch south of Gerroa. Again, rather a Golfcourse than housing, at least a GC won't impact the wind like those highrises did on the Northern Beaches...
black dog
black dog
SA
42 posts
SA, 42 posts
9 Nov 2006 4:41pm
Golf courses on the waters edge are great
The grass is so soft and clean... just perfect for rigging and de-rigging your sails on !

woof woof
rosey
rosey
NSW
575 posts
NSW, 575 posts
9 Nov 2006 5:25pm
saw it on the news about 20 seconds ago, looks pretty crazy!
easty
easty
TAS
2213 posts
TAS, 2213 posts
9 Nov 2006 6:25pm
yeah we're currently fighting a stupid proposed development down here in hobart. check out this location.
www.seabreeze.com.au/gallery/gallery.asp?imageid=2733
they want to build a "gold coast style" canal housing estate over the sand flats. this is one of the most consistantly windy spots during our predominant westerlies, most tides has a long stretch of knee deep water for L platers, and is home to the endangered spotted hand fish and numerous wading birds who fly down from siberia to breed. and who'd want to live on the water in one of the windiest places around? complete madness.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14953 posts
QLD, 14953 posts
9 Nov 2006 5:40pm
hi easty, slightly off topic but.

your solution may be in front of you....

"home" to endangered spotted hand fish and numerous wading birds who fly down from siberia to breed.....

that should help stop things in their tracks. find yourself a friendly EPA windsurfer and you may have a chance to fight them on the beaches.
easty
easty
TAS
2213 posts
TAS, 2213 posts
9 Nov 2006 7:43pm
gestalt, there has formed a "save ralph's bay" committee, and they are doing a very professional job of blocking this development. they have made good use of their ammunition, ie/ the local wildlife, and some slightly suspicious government practices.
Harrow
Harrow
NSW
4521 posts
NSW, 4521 posts
9 Nov 2006 7:51pm
Don't forget the port expansion that is going to destroy the sailing spot on the eastern side of the airport that is used for those autumn westerlies.
Harrow
Harrow
NSW
4521 posts
NSW, 4521 posts
9 Nov 2006 7:55pm
quote:
Not to mention the boat traffic and pollution which will come with it.


Don't forget, wind powered craft have right of way. Just wipe out the nose of your board with a huge catapult? No worries, just bear off into the path of some big cruiser driven by some rich guy with no idea of the navigation rules. Presto - new board!
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
9 Nov 2006 9:54pm
Harrow, if the rich guy in his cruizer is like all the other boating and jet ski idiots down there at the moment, better make sure you are wearing a life vest... you are more than likely going to get run over, then yelled at and finally left for dead...



stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
9 Nov 2006 9:57pm
Cheer cheer, you are right. it was a golf course... the strange thing is that the proposal is for the golf course to be build in what is currently zoned as a national park... or at least so I have been told.

It remains to be seen how chopping down the trees in favour of a golf course will effect the wind...
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14953 posts
QLD, 14953 posts
10 Nov 2006 12:02am
glad to hear that easty. hope it goes well.


the proposed development at brighton does look very nice. impressive architecture to say the least.

DavMen
DavMen
NSW
1510 posts
NSW, 1510 posts
10 Nov 2006 8:29am
quote:
Originally posted by Gestalt

glad to hear that easty. hope it goes well.


the proposed development at brighton does look very nice. impressive architecture to say the least.




As an architectural thesis goes, sure it looks really nice.

In reality we all know there is nothing nicer than looking at uninterrupted views of water and people enjoying this water.

If the gurus want to talk aesthetics, I can't see haw looking at a marina from a coffee shop with a lot boat masts rocking back and forth makes for an attractive view. Just have a look at Manly up Brissy way - there’s nothing attractive about that - just think how much nicer manly would be without the marina.

DavMen

DavMen
DavMen
NSW
1510 posts
NSW, 1510 posts
10 Nov 2006 8:35am
?
Crash Landing
Crash Landing
NSW
1173 posts
NSW, 1173 posts
10 Nov 2006 10:42am
Looking at the plans/drawings it seems that they have reduced the width of the road to a shared use/pedestrian one lane road. Is this not the MAIN ROAD SOUTH out Sydney? I don't head that way too often but the traffic is terrible anyway, surely this is going to make it even worse. However, if in a NE, can't you just head out closer to Dolls Point? Should be more wind and more chop to jump down there anywhere.

Lets be honest it's not the nicest looking bit of Sydney down that way anyway with a runway, refinery, port....
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
10 Nov 2006 7:57am
crash landing,

they will redirect the traffic. The area around Brighton will become a "reduced traffic" zone probably meaning they will close it for any through traffic. The re-routed traffic will flow via the main road west of Brighton (can't remember what it's called).

In a NEer the chop is indeed a bit better down at dolls but the wind is definitly 5 to 10 knts. stronger further north near the run way. Dolls is also good in a strong straight northerly. Doesn't happen to often but when it does the chop just off Dolls point is great for jumps. No sure how the pier would influence that though.

I agree that it's not a nice looking bit of Sydney. But in a southerly and NEer it's definetly the windiest of all Sydney spots. Also, don't forget that it's fairly safe for beginners to intermediates (even in a strong wind) compared to any of the harbour or open ocean locations.



Crash Landing
Crash Landing
NSW
1173 posts
NSW, 1173 posts
10 Nov 2006 11:45am
stehsegler, I agree it is an excellent and safe spot and i have had some awesome sails there.

End of the day though, it doesn't look like the mariner is sticking that far out and in a NE the wind should still come through (although i haven't seen a proper aerial drawing).

It is ****e though.
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
10 Nov 2006 11:34am
Crash Landing,

take a look at the photo here:

www.seabreeze.com.au/gallery/gallery.asp?imageid=2743

From the photo you can see that the pier comes out where the Shell Gas stations currently is. Building will be located on that section of the pier. I would guess it will stick out by about 250 meters.

The NEer might not be effected (but that remains to be seen). Southerly will definetly be gusty right behind the pier. You might experience a funnel between the seawall and the airport runway though.
Gonewindsurfing247
Gonewindsurfing247
WA
966 posts
WA, 966 posts
10 Nov 2006 12:23pm
This really sadens me. Kyeemagh use to be one of my favourite sailing spots in Sydney.

To see all the bright coloured sails dashing across the bay was a spectacular sight and a really unique feature of the bay.

Yeah but who cares about the specticle and people when we can make money from a marina. B loody coucils and developers!!! Next Meriton will be building units there as well.

My advice, do what I did, move to Perth.
md74
md74
QLD
1064 posts
QLD, 1064 posts
10 Nov 2006 11:34pm
famous words from the mayor candidate for Porpoise Spit, Bill "the battler" Hislop ,

"you cant stop progress"
stehsegler
stehsegler
WA
3571 posts
WA, 3571 posts
11 Nov 2006 6:39am
or corporate greed.
qwerty
qwerty
NSW
807 posts
NSW, 807 posts
12 Nov 2006 5:07pm
Stehsegler, the golf course proposed for Gerroa is not going to be in the national park (on the beach front), but on the land located on the western side of the road that leads down to Shoalhaven Heads.

The only good thing is that it won't affect the wind in any way. But the crowds at the beach,and in the water, will cause many problems. They already do.

There is a lot of opposition to this development.
The problem is, developments of this size seem to be able to bypass council approval, and go straight to the NSW planning minister,which happens to be Frank Sator. Kiama Council are in fact dead against this proposal. They want to protect the area from sh!tty developments like this.
However, Shoalhaven Council, who control the other half of that stretch of land, don't seem to give a sh!t.

As with the Windang wall proposal, we will be throwing some punches. we should be more noticable this time because its not just sailors that will have a problem with it. This really is a hideous pile of sh!t to be dumped into what we all know is an awesome natural area.
But, the developers (Cleary Brothers construction company) wouldn't give a sh!t about anything but their own back pockets.

The opposition to this should be much more vocal. We will certainly be getting as many NSWWA members to send in their objection, and hopefully many more.
There is no way that any local resident would think that this is a good idea. Public consultation is starting to surface, but they don't exactly bring a lot of attention to it, knowing the opposition they would face.

Will keep you posted.
Gestalt
Gestalt
QLD
14953 posts
QLD, 14953 posts
12 Nov 2006 5:15pm
if you guys are really opposed to these developments (and i understand why) you should all be joining NSWWA.

there is typically a couple of good ways to stop or ammend a development.

1. view rights. (if you own a propery overlooking a development)
2. environmental concerns (EPA)
3. User group concerns. (an incorporated club)
4. loss of business concerns.

so user groups concerns could be a good avenue. a user group normally must be an incorporated club to be considered valid. this will give an opportunity for the leaders of the club to attend public discussions and help affect a positive outcome for all concerned.

this doesn't mean it will stop a development but has the potential to create positive outcomes for the user group. whether it be at the proposed site or down the road somewhere. things like bbq, sand beaches, rigging areas, better parking, landscaping etc can be faught for. or the developers will just give you a large chunk of money and ask you to go away.

so everyone should be joining their respective state bodies. the more members the more power can be gained.
Please Register, or first...
Topics Subscribe Reply

Return To Classic site 😭
Or... let us know if a problem, so we can tweak! 😅