Ever since the red thumb button was taken away from us here on sea breeze, people like me have lost everything. We can no longer express our feelings and no one else can express there true feelings towards me..

bring back the red thumbs

Maybe you're taking the p!ss, but i agree. It could well have stopped the pettiness that has caused the moderators so much grief just of late. people getting a reality check from a jury of their peers before they message laurie with a sob story could well have made them think twice about bothering.

they might get (and see) two green thumbs, but theres 10 others who don't agree with them. They don't get that un-opinionated clip over the ear. and when they get someone who can be bothered to speak up, it just spirals into a spiteful argument and ends in tears.

of course there will always be trolls who don't really give a crap about their red thumbs, but for the larger part..

MAYBE A EMOJI UP DATE would be better ,Like the emojis on our phones ...

Sounds like a further extension of social media censorship. People should have the freedom to express an opinion in the same way people have the freedom to ignore you if you are rude. Personally, I find it more of an offence when the odd person here uses crude language, but I am not their school teacher or mother to lecture them or take away their toys. Perhaps we need an emoji that looks like a bar a soap. By ticking it we suggest that the language needs some cleaning up.

The amount of social media censorship is wrong because the person censoring assumes that they have a superior moral character. I know that trolls are bad but so are telemarketers and weeds in my garden. How many people criticise the weather bureau, without cause when they are frustrated that there is no wind? Is that comment much the same as a red emoji? If you want to see some really bad language and behaviour then watch some sessions of parliament question time when they go at each other maliciously and with intent. Unfortunately, you can't legislate morality, anyway, it just creates a new class of hypocrites.

[The writer advises that no animals were harmed by the words written above.]

Nah, keep it simple with red and green. I could never understand why the red was taken down.

That last 'ignore' function would be great. I think we would all choose to ignore posts from the serial forum pest

airsail said..
Laurie is liable if posts are allowed to remain which are of a defamatory nature and someone take offence.

It's not censorship, it's just Laurie trying to avoid ending up in court. Blame the courts for making being admin on a forum or social media site so difficult.

www.australiancommunitymanagers.com.au/blog/social-media-liability-voller-ruling

Red thumbs or ignore functions might actually reduce this risk ...

When I saw the title of this post, I thought really? Some spend way too much time on this site to bicker about this! Let's get to the important stuff, our passion for windsurfing!

azymuth said..

Dezza said..
That last 'ignore' function would be great. I think we would all choose to ignore posts from the serial forum pest

+1 for ignore function.
Incessant bragging on this forum is tedious and childish.
Perhaps a daily limit on posts might work too.

As long as we don't have a daily limit on how many times someone can log on

airsail said..
Laurie is liable if posts are allowed to remain which are of a defamatory nature and someone take offence.

It's not censorship, it's just Laurie trying to avoid ending up in court. Blame the courts for making being admin on a forum or social media site so difficult.

www.australiancommunitymanagers.com.au/blog/social-media-liability-voller-ruling

Defamation cases are costly to prosecute so it is rare for ordinary people to pursue justice through the courts. A lot of people threaten to sue but the lawyers fees are way too expensive to go much further. That is why we see actors, rich people and celebrities in courts pursuing damages. They are the only ones who can afford it. As such, I wonder what the risk is for a bunch of salt seasoned windsurfers getting overly precious about a comment they don't like. I don't know of anyone in the community who would act in such a way.

MarkSSC said..

airsail said..
Laurie is liable if posts are allowed to remain which are of a defamatory nature and someone take offence.

It's not censorship, it's just Laurie trying to avoid ending up in court. Blame the courts for making being admin on a forum or social media site so difficult.

www.australiancommunitymanagers.com.au/blog/social-media-liability-voller-ruling

Defamation cases are costly to prosecute so it is rare for ordinary people to pursue justice through the courts. A lot of people threaten to sue but the lawyers fees are way too expensive to go much further. That is why we see actors, rich people and celebrities in courts pursuing damages. They are the only ones who can afford it. As such, I wonder what the risk is for a bunch of salt seasoned windsurfers getting overly precious about a comment they don't like. I don't know of anyone in the community who would act in such a way.

Too many "no win, no fee" lawyers out there and there is now a previous judgement against an administrator.
I'm sure Laurie doesn't want to take the risk.

John340 said..
Nah, keep it simple with red and green. I could never understand why the red was taken down.

Oh I can. Trust me....

John340 said..

JakeNN said..

not everyone has time to read endless pages of text.

bad replies need to flagged and hidden, so they dont waste people's time.

Hiding is a form of censorship. Better to let them post. All we need is a simple method of letting the poster know what we think.

You can open and expand and read if you want to.

Example here .. you can see the 'compressed / hidden ' replies and expand to read if you feel the need ... scroll through the comments here ... and you can see a few greyed out headings with a button to 'show'.

www.ozbargain.com.au/node/685508

It also encourages users to post valuable replies as they know that pointless points will be flagged and compressed / hidden.

t36 said..
This is not prohibiting a Dunning-Kruger-victim like LeeD to post hot air in multiple threads parallel, but every new or unexperienced user knows after one view on his points, what's going on.

Suspension is the best solution for people like this, which is what appears to have happened.

Green only is so dumb and precious.
so some idiot post something stupid, then five other idiots like it. Then at a glance that stupid comment appears as though it has popular support but the truth is 99% of people think have the opposite view of it.
it's just green washing BS

tbwonder said..

t36 said..
This is not prohibiting a Dunning-Kruger-victim like LeeD to post hot air in multiple threads parallel, but every new or unexperienced user knows after one view on his points, what's going on.

Suspension is the best solution for people like this, which is what appears to have happened.

Alleluia, I think you might be right. I wonder how long for?