stehsegler said...
On the other hand going from a 4.5 to a 4.0 is a big difference. Something to do with the force of the wind increasing exponentially... but I won't bore you with the details of that.
Stegs, I'll help you out, because I don't think you would be able to explain it on your own.
It's interesting stuff, give people some credit, I don't think anybody would get bored.
But it was probably best you didn't provide any details because it's too hard to explain aerodynamics in sentence form. Here is the Formula.
As you can see, the Lift (force) of the sail goes up or down in a linear fashion with sail area, when you have the same type of sail, in the same wind, at the same angle of attack.
This formula also answers the OP. It's all about the lift coefficient (CL). You can generate the same lift from a smaller sail by sheeting it in more, but you loose efficiency, this is why Slalom sailors always run a larger sail at a lower angle of attack, they have a better lift to drag ratio. That floppy leech is good..
Iceman said...
I noticed that they were using a great deal more downhaul than I was. I was setting my sail as per what I imagine the manufacturer recommends, loose at the top but not overly floppy. Their rigs were very loose and so they would only be using half of the power available for them, the rest being exhausted in the loose leech.
With the leverage we have over the rig, it's imposible to utilise any extra power generated at the top of the sail. The top is there to hold the bottom up, the bottom generates the useable power..
You get more lift with less downhaul because the sail is fuller all over, your not really getting extra lift from loosing less out the exhaust.