kookonasup said...
Why not just have a vote without the 100 word essay reply?
Because we learn nothing from a vote. Votes reflect the current state of knowledge, they don't advance it.
For years we were told that eating fat causes heart disease. There were one or two people who argued that this was not the case. They were silenced by the majority who decried them. Now it is becoming accepted that it is sugar not fat that is largely the problem (in this one particular cause of heart disease) and they were right all along. Many people will have died because they followed the majority opinion advice. This does not of course mean that minority opinions are always right. But it is interesting to note how hard it was for the minority opinion to make itself heard, even when it was right. This is the "herd effect" in action.
articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/11/04/saturated-fat-intake.aspxI am a scientist by trade. I see all the time how damaging it can be to turn discussions into popularity contests rather than reasoned arguments. Votes reflect the current state of opinion. But they also reinforce it: doubters think "well, if 75% of people believe this then it must be true, and if I say something that doesn't agree with this I'll have 75% of people criticising me". So they just keep quiet.
So feedback of the red thumb type alters the nature of the discussion you get, and can stifle innovation and creativity. You have to be very careful with it. Do you want the breeze to be a place of encouragement or of criticism?