Pro-gun US woman shot in back by 4yo son after she boasted about his marksmanship



www.abc.net.au/news/2016-03-10/pro-gun-us-woman-jamie-gilt-shot-in-back-by-4yo-son/7235802


That's made my week

At least they'll be well armed for when the Mexicans start climbing over the wall to invade.

Mark _australia said..
4 is bloody ridiculous.

I know, how good a shot is he if he missed her head

I bet she wished she was carrying another gun she could turn on him so she could protect herself from him.

Gotta have more guns, cos its safer right?

ka43 said..
Stupid laws.
An aside like Jupiters. After my dad passed away I found my old air rifle (slug gun) in a cupboard. I rang the local cop shop and asked if they could collect.
I was told "Just bring it in and we will destroy it for you"
I calmy asked what the police would do if they spotted a bloke walking into a police station carrying what could be seen as a rifle.
The guy on the phone paused and then said "Ill get some general duties officers to collect it from you". They did the next day.

Reminds me of walking into South Perth cop shop with my pump action shotgun during the buy back. I few were diving under desks ha ha. Helped as I was in my motor bike leather jacket and had a helmet in the other hand.

Chris_M said..
I bet she wished she was carrying another gun she could turn on him so she could protect herself from him.

Gotta have more guns, cos its safer right?

What a silly remark. It is terrible that a 4y/o shot anyone, and even more so that his mum thought a 4y/o could be taught to shoot.
But a kid shooting mum has no logical bearing upon the use of guns (or not) for protection in the USA. Cos a 4y/o should not have one. Much like a 10 y/o crashing a car should not impinge upon the ability of adults to have one.
If my 10 y/o drives my car I AM the retard, not anyone else.
You are confusing access to guns in general, with 'should they have ability to buy one for protection'. Very different issues.


And the fact the Yanks have ability to buy guns for personal protection has diddly-squat to do with anything here in Australia.


If you are trying to be funny (I hope not cos nobody would make remarks like that about a lady getting run over, raped or bashed) then you'd do well to realise your country has way more lax gun laws than Australia.

Mark _australia said..

Chris_M said..
I bet she wished she was carrying another gun she could turn on him so she could protect herself from him.

Gotta have more guns, cos its safer right?

What a silly remark. It is terrible that a 4y/o shot anyone, and even more so that his mum thought a 4y/o could be taught to shoot.
But a kid shooting mum has no logical bearing upon the use of guns (or not) for protection in the USA. Cos a 4y/o should not have one. Much like a 10 y/o crashing a car should not impinge upon the ability of adults to have one.
If my 10 y/o drives my car I AM the retard, not anyone else.
You are confusing access to guns in general, with 'should they have ability to buy one for protection'. Very different issues.


And the fact the Yanks have ability to buy guns for personal protection has diddly-squat to do with anything here in Australia.


If you are trying to be funny (I hope not cos nobody would make remarks like that about a lady getting run over, raped or bashed) then you'd do well to realise your country has way more lax gun laws than Australia.

She made her own bed in this case Mark.

She is unaustralian

Guns dont kill people, people kill people. lol Stupid thing that gun loving rednecks say.

But some people think that some people should be aloud to have guns so they can protect some people they love,
but then some people go crazy and kill some people with their gun, usually some of those people killed are the some people they loved and wanted to protect.

Some people are stupid if they think some people should be aloud to have guns.

That's what some people I know think anyway.

Mastbender said..




But you don't, right? Classic.

That's like "I have a good friend who has a sexual problem but he is too afraid to ask, so I will ask for him."

its okay mast bender, we allready know your sexual problem. your names mastbender ffs

Some interesting perspectives from the gun community and shows how incident like this have a logical bearing upon the use of guns for protection in the USA.
It also has relevance to anyone who carries a sidearm

www.thetruthaboutguns.com/jamie-gilt-irresponsible-gun-owner-of-the-day/

Mark _australia said..
^^^ Wow, that is what even gun all owners have said. Great contribution, Ian.


It does not "have relevance to anyone who carries a sidearm" as a kid can't get the gun when holstered and any half smart person does not allow kids access.

The simple version for you :
(1) this lady was dumb
(2) it does not have any bearing upon gun ownership any more than we should ban pools cos sometimes poor supervision or security leads to a toddler drowning.

/end thread.

Yes, but how many toddlers drown other toddlers?

Kamikuza said..

Yes, but how many toddlers drown other toddlers?

all toddler drownings are caused by other toddlers, we just never suspect the bastards is all. like baby birds pushing the siblings out of the nest, when are these little ****ers going to end theyre savagery